this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

12 readers
2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

So everyone will hate this I’m sure. I think even I might hate it. BUT it would make the all star game competitive I’d hope.

Basically you’d change the play in so that the winning conference play in has 7 locked spots. 8v9 play for 8th. The loser of that and the winner of 10v11 play for an opportunity to get entered into the other conference. The other conference has 6 locked spots. 7v8 play for 7th. 9 plays against the team from the all star winning conference. If the other conference team wins they get 8th seed. If 9 wins they play the loser of 7v8.

It’s a silly idea and adds a game for that team but would add stakes to the all star game. Obvious problem is it undos a bit of the point of the play in on one conference but then opens it up on the other. Also probably too complicated.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whtge8@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Only way to actually make that game competitive is to offer like 100 million to the winning team or something ridiculous like that.

[–] horseshoeoverlook@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I had a chance to talk to Mark Tatum last week he said there will be definitely some changes to this year’s All-Star game but not this drastic lol

[–] the_greasy_one@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So if my conference loses it means less playoff teams to fend off? Great!

[–] The_prawn_king@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

No you’d still have to play the same amount of playoff teams