this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
617 points (97.5% liked)

politics

20671 readers
4922 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Democrats must reclaim their identity as the party of the working class to regain electoral strength.

Despite pro-labor policies under Biden, working-class voters feel disconnected, seeing Democrats as defenders of a failing system.

The party’s decline traces back to NAFTA and neoliberal economic policies that favored corporations over workers.

A generational effort to prioritize labor rights, fair wages, and economic security while addressing working-class frustrations are needed.

Without serious reform, Democrats will continue losing ground to populist alternatives.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That'll be the day.

The Democrat party is not a democratic party, they are a neoliberal, technocratic party. They don't want the people to rule, they want neoliberal technocrats to rule. I don't see that changing, anytime soon.

A workers' party would have to be a majoritarian, democratic party, because the workers are the vast majority of the population.

[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (9 children)

MAGA took over the GOP in just a few years. I think the same thing can happen to the DNC. Just need a little propaganda, some charismatic leadership, and people willing to slander the establishment.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

MAGA had a lot of money pushed at it. The Koch Bros independently funded the Tea Party movement until Trump was created, then Russian money began to flow.

There is no such money faucet for leftist groups. In fact, a massive lack of funding has been one of the chief struggles these groups have had for decades.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Yes, AND it's worth bearing in mind that some democratic strategists apparently think the path to being the "worker's party" is to embrace social conservatism. Trans people aren't the reason I will never retire, they aren't the reason I'll never be able to take my kids on a real vacation, or why we're one "get fucked lmao" from being bankrupted by health insurance. The assholes in this party who have a vision of trying to capture moderate Republicans need to show themselves the door. Bernie and Trump both show that you'll get the votes when you promise big changes to this busted ass system AND people believe that you'll actually do it. Stop trying to be yesteryear republicans; start promising shit that hurts the big donors' feelings and meaning it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 6 points 1 day ago (11 children)

As a non American, I've been told by an American colleagues that the Republicans are traditionally the worker's party. Could someone please clarify?

Additionally, my opinion is that the entire system needs to be abolished to allow representation from more than two parties to represent how diverse America is.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2018-05-01-the-myth-of-the-republican-democrat-switch/

Tldr: Democrats were the party of the South until the 90s

Alabama, for example, didn't elect a Republican governor until 1986. Mississippi didn't elect one until 1991. Georgia didn't elect one until 2002.

Claims Nixon was the Republican who came up with the idea of pandering to racists

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_United_States_presidential_election

See Jimmy Carter’s support in the South

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I would really like to know why your American colleagues think that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Biden’s pro-union moves are historic, but voters need more than symbolism. Effectively outlines the problem and proposes actionable solutions.

🐱🐱🐱🐱

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The same neoliberal policies republicans supported yet aren’t held accountable for because 🤷‍♂️

[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Because Democrats are holding the bag

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There needs to be a worker's party. It doesn't have to be the Democrats.

That there are only going to be two viable parties in this country is a mathematical inevitability of how our voting system works, but there's no reason why the Democrats have to remain one of those parties. If what they're doing right now is the best they've got then they shouldn't be difficult to replace. A damp sandwich could do a better job.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›