this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
30 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

8951 readers
1674 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
30
The PM isn't an MP, unusual, but it has happened before. (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 13 hours ago by merc@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Currently the PM doesn't have a seat in the house. If he visited the house, he'd have to go to the visitor's gallery.

It's an interesting situation. The PM is the leader of the federal liberal party, but he's not a member of parliament. But, does he need to be? Is the PM sitting in the house of commons just a tradition that nobody has challenged yet? Could the PM delegate things inside the house of commons to their deputy-PM and then do things like give speeches, attend diplomatic functions, etc.?

The US has a very different system where the president isn't part of the legislative branch at all. But, typically presidents don't twiddle their thumbs waiting for something to do. Being the head of state keeps most presidents busy. It makes me wonder if technically Carney could choose not to run for office, and just spend his time doing head-of-state things rather than legislative things.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

It doesn't matter. There will be a vote of non confidence and we'll go into a federal election as soon as parliament reopens.

Edit: so I just learned today that he had a constitutional obligation to trigger an election.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think the jouse will sit again. He'll go to the GG and ask for parliament to be dissolved. Why have the government fall when he wants to go to the polls anyways?

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

I edited my comment. Please take another look.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but technically he doesn't need to run in that election.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Normally when a mp quits there's a partial election. No?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago

By-elections, yeah. When one quits or dies or somehow leaves an office empty. That means that even if there's no immediate election, there will be one for Papineau to replace Trudeau. Also, if there isn't an election called right away, most likely another Liberal will quit in a riding where Carney will be elected easily.

But! AFAIK he could also just choose not to be an MP. He won't, but I think technically he could.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think in the short term he'll just keep the status quo, if for no other reason than there's a shit ton of stuff that needs to taken care of NOW.

When the writ drops and a timeline is established he'll run in the federal election, after most of the planning is already completed.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

I know what he'll probably do, but it's interesting to think that it's not strictly necessary that he actually becomes an MP.