this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
34 points (97.2% liked)

Canada

9336 readers
1848 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That means we don't need to pour dump trucks full of tax money directly into large and established Canadian companies' pockets. But, instead, maybe we can diversify local suppliers and incentivize the development of smaller local businesses, and maybe crown corporation manufacturing and logistics?

The BC government on the ball with my thinking...

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Too big to fail?

I hope you're right, but I don't trust the system that much.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's good to hear, but can their laid off employees and their customers weather it? That's going to be the question. Because that's probably how a lot of them are planning to deal with it. CEOs don't give a shit about you and they're not going to dip into their strategic assets or long-term investments or god forbid their compensation packages to pay a tariff or to pay anyone. They need that, you know? They don't need you.

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I read that headline much more pessimistically than you guys. Turn it around and "nearly half of manufacturers won't survive a year with current trade wars"

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I kinda read it like people saying they couldn’t face a $200 expense.

At face value they feel that in a poll, but in reality when you sit down and look at hard options in earnest things become different.

That’s not to totally dismiss it, but I think this is an under estimate of the real number of companies that will survive.

I do think it will be rough, and I hope I can do whatever part to help make things better these next years.

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The company might be able to. How about all the workers they fuck over while they try to survive, though?