this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
304 points (97.2% liked)

News

28270 readers
5319 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah no not happening

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (28 children)

Solution:

Motor-voting registration in all states through the DMV. You already have to prove citizenship for Real ID. Make sure everyone getting a state ID is also registered to vote.

Then you do 100% vote by mail.

Republicans: "Wait, not like that..."

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If they making obtaining a verified id free, sign me up. Forcing citizens to spend money to exercise their right to vote sounds illegal. I'm not an expert, do not quote me, just my thoughts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 56 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Do ya one better. Make voting mandatory.

[–] PurpleSkull@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Now THAT would end the Republican party forever. And it would be an easy sell for Democrats too.

"Since our president loves democracy and voting integrity so much, let's pass a bipartisan law requiring all eligible citizens to vote or face penalties of fines and imprisonment."

Then watch the mental gymnastics of MAGAs trying to argue how mandatory voting and voting in general is a bad idea.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (26 children)

Not everyone needs a real ID, and you'd just be preventing poor citizens from voting.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] FringeTheory999@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (12 children)

A lot of people don’t have IDs or licenses, they cost money, you have to take time off of work to get them, which also costs money, and a lot of people have barriers to getting ID if they lack supporting paperwork, like a birth certificate, bills in your name to prove address, three forms if ID, etc. heck lots of people don’t even have an address at all. People who don’t have easy access to supporting paperwork, who don’t have addresses, or can’t afford fees are all allowed to vote. This cuts a lot of the most vulnerable people in the country out of the democratic process, which is why the righties are always pushing for this stuff. They’d rather that the people who stand to lose the most from right wing policies be unable to vote against those policies.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

By its terms, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1, referred to as the Elections Clause, contemplates that state legislatures will establish the times, places, and manner of holding elections for the House of Representatives and the Senate, subject to Congress making or altering such state regulations (except as to the place of choosing Senators).1 The Supreme Court has interpreted the Elections Clause expansively, enabling states "to provide a complete code for congressional elections, not only as to times and places, but in relation to notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices, counting of votes, duties of inspectors and canvassers, and making and publication of election returns."2

IANAL: This sounds like more grandstanding to appease his cult sure to be challenged.

[–] kriz@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still dangerous even if challenged. First, he ignores any court orders. Second, when "elections" come around he can say blue states didn't follow the law and throw out their votes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halfempty@fedia.io 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well that will never stand up in court. The Executive branch doesn't unilaterally create federal election policy. Trump has passed from unconstitutional, to ANTI-constitutional.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 1 week ago

Our king need not concern his highness with trivialities of law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK_SANCHEZ@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

And just like that, F-47 ended illegal voting ladies and gents!

Outside the theatrics for his idiotic base, has anyone informed Felon-47 that this is already the case?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›