this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38435 readers
371 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI, the artificial intelligence company behind ChatGPT, said it has finalized a funding round that will bring in $40 billion from SoftBank Group Corp. and other investors at a $300 billion valuation, including money raised.

The AI developer’s financing round is the largest of all time, according to data compiled by research firm PitchBook. The deal values the ChatGPT maker at almost double its previous valuation of $157 billionwhen it raised money in October. Bloomberg reported on March 26 that OpenAI was close to buttoning up the $40 billion financing deal.

“Hundreds of millions people use ChatGPT each week,” Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman said in a statement Monday. “This investment helps us push the frontier and make AI more useful in everyday life.”

SoftBank, which is leading the deal, will initially invest $7.5 billion in the company along with $2.5 billion from an investor syndicate, according to a person familiar with the agreement. Additional investors in the group include Microsoft Corp., Coatue Management, Altimeter Capital Management, and Thrive Capital, said the person, who asked not to be identified discussing private details. There will be a second tranche of $30 billion invested by the end of 2025, including $22.5 billion from SoftBank and $7.5 billion from a syndicate, this person said.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 14 points 1 day ago

What is this? "Give us another $40 billion and we can have a compelling product"? AI at this point is glorified Clippy. And Altman has already said he needs $7 trillion.

I've used ChatGPT in daily work, and while it does things I need it to do, it's a timesaver, not some sort of view-the-whole-world-in-a-new-way-after-losing-one's-virginity solution, which is what it's been sold as since (apologies) release.

[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Insane to me with how much competition there is that are just as good along with all the free stuff available. It's not like early YouTube growing an insane amount of content before it started monetizing heavily. OpenAI is one of like a dozen, probably more, generative AI companies that are all close to each other in quality

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I agree with you, ChatGPT is the one that people really know about in the mainstream. It is Normie AI

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also the most accessible - just literally go to a website - don't even have to login if you don't want.

DeepSeek you have to install a fucking chrome extension (good luck doing that at work), or you have to create an account.

OpenAI still following the bigtech trend of "get them hooked for free, then make money"

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

There are some that are even more accessible. For example, if you use bing, it is right there at the start

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

There's inherent self-selection going on by being on Lemmy in the first place. Plenty of people are happy to just take in what the algorithm feeds to them and are unaware of how URLs work; they just click links.

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago