this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
15 points (85.7% liked)

Technology

2362 readers
382 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The new encryption system doesn’t require external exchange of keys or complex user certificate management

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Later this year, when the feature is fully implemented, Workspace users with E2EE enabled will be able to send encrypted messages to any external email users. Instead of the message, recipients will receive a link that, when clicked, will take them to a restricted version of Gmail where they need to authenticate with the organization’s chosen identity provider to view the decrypted message. External users will also be able to reply within the same restricted Gmail interface.

How can it be end2end then? If you don't have some kind of public key of your recipient, but they are still able to read the message once they proofed their identity, that means that the secret to decrypt the mail is stored on Google servers and/or part of the link which is send in a non-encrypted plain-text mail.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Google waving its huge cock around again. Cant play nice with the decentralized world of email. They HAVE to keep everything locked in their own ecosystem.

Complete with backdoors

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

I just see vendor lock-in. A closed source solution?

End to end encryption already exists for email without everyone using the same service. Using open source solutions.

How many services has google canceled through the years? What happens to email send by this when that alphabet department looses a turf war? Unrelated : how can anyone reasonably trust this company to keep secrets?