this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1326 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

68400 readers
4695 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

More proof Rainbow Capitalism was a lie/ad campaign to take more money from queers.

I wish I could rub this in the face of every cishet who said Rainbow Capitalism was actual progress.

[–] InsincereLogic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

(For reference: I am cishet, but have family & friends in the LGBTQ+ community and consider myself an ally.) Usually just lurk, but I feel you so badly.

I've been saying it forever as well. They're spending millions, to specifically target/advertise/appeal to the community... out of the goodness of their hearts? Right.

Then as soon as its "over", the facade drops and its on to the next big event/target market. Rinse and repeat.

[–] daddakamabb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

As a cishet I saw it what was as soon as they started it. It was about 10-15 years ago. It was sleazy then, and it's sleazy now. They are just trying to milk the population as much as they can. They don't give two fucks about inclusiveness or equality. They know a large portion of Americans want equality. So it's a cash cow.

[–] deepfuckingdumb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, in the past companies wouldn't be caught dead associating with LGBTQ+ people, let alone take their money. Now LGBTQ+ is acceptable enough for predatory advertising so...idk progress from like a fucked up capitalist perspective I guess?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zenforyen@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

Haha absolutely, I'm also one of the people who always said all this rainbow and green washing is bullshit. As if they ever cared for anything.

Capitalism has no values, except for one: shareholder value. Yesterday they help sending people to concentration camps, today they help saving the world and increasing diversity, yeah, totally convincing.

There is one thing to rely on with capitalism - if you convince people you can make good money with it or it is good for the brand, they will jump onto it and squeeze the shit out of it. An abstract, amoral force, made from a large number of concrete shitty people.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 107 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's almost impressive how quickly the whole of the business world capitulated to Donald Trump.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (10 children)

It’s almost like their support for these issues was never genuine to begin with.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Exactly. :-/

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

They didn't capitulate. They were mostly faking it all along, friend. It made for good profit at the time and to get good Blackrock or Vanguard investment money. This is why despite putting rainbows in X, or FB, or YT, or LinkedIn profiles in the USA or in some Western countries, no company ever did that in any profile outside the West. It was all for show... and money. If they actually believe it they would have done so across the board. Yet they didn't. They were just hoping most people wouldn't notice. Many did. There was a meme RE: this floating around from years ago, too.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's too hard to change anything, but only if it's progressive policies. Fascist policies can be implemented immediately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sizing2673@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

This is what's fucking shitty about this

Every company and every politician and every person who bends over so willingly IS THE PROBLEM

It's like they announce their regime and these idiots roll out the red carpets immediately ready be the first company to suck the government off

If they all stood their ground, it would buy more time

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They didn't capitulate. They never fought. They just did what was the best shot at earning money and gaining ground at the time.

Don't ever expect moral based behavior in capitalism or geopolitics.

[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Slavishly Follow the Fascist Government's Lead

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 71 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Man this whole anticipatory compliance with the fascist regime shit is fucking awful

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TemplaerDude@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They also allowed a pedo back on their platform

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Keep using uorigin for blocking as. Also use Firefox.

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Switch to AdNauseam.

It clicks ads in addition to blocking them.

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What does this achieve other than funneling money from companies' advertising budget to Google a little faster?

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 6 points 1 day ago

It undermines the integrity of the digital advertising ecosystem while providing additional income for website operators.

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 46 points 2 days ago (9 children)

First reddit now youtube. Welcome to the tech broligarchy

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] u10ji@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm a little bit confused on this: if you visit the policy page now it does (at least for me, in Europe) still list "Sex, Gender, or Sexual Orientation" as a protected group in that exact same list. Obviously slightly different as they've combined a couple of different groups in there where previously they were delineated: plus I wonder if this is potentially showing because I'm in a different region. Would be interested to see what someone in NA sees: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801939

EDIT: Nevermind, saw further in the thread

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 79 points 2 days ago (3 children)

When an influential group of powerful people make hate speech a part of their standard rhetoric, is EXACTLY when you MUST block it on your platform, not a signal that it's time to start letting it slide, you fucking pricks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention 'sex, gender, or sexual orientation', which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mooncake@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago (11 children)

It's time to boycott Google as well now hu? Already ditched their search engine and moved to kagi

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not in favor of YouTube, but what exactly missing here?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 158 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (16 children)

Stop using youtube.

EDIT: A lot of people real fuckin triggered by this and looking for any excuse to keep using. Fucking addicts.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 129 points 3 days ago (103 children)

What else has such a catalog? Going to be hard to persuade creators to host their own content with ads and subscriptions.

load more comments (103 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 137 points 3 days ago (9 children)

So, sundar pinchai can be added to the list of CEOs that suck?

Because a lot of the time, it's weird that when the company does nasty shit, nobody names him as the head asshole in charge the way that other companies and ceos get handled.

The dude has been in the driver's seat for pretty much every major deterioration of Google/alphabet for years.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago

Prabhakar Raghavanalso also deserves a dishonorable mention.

[–] Enelop@lemm.ee 108 points 3 days ago

He donated a million to Trump’s “inauguration” and sat in the VIP section, he was already a CEO that sucks.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FatTony@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Probably because no one is actually using any gender identity based bigotry any more. So they might as well just remove it, it saves space. /s

[–] PerfectDark@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (10 children)

And people judged me for watching YouTube with uBlock Origin, or via NewPipe for eons.

Look who's laughing now.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 44 points 2 days ago (14 children)

I hated Google far before it was cool. I would feel vindicated if it weren't so damn overdue. They don't even contribute meaningfully to society. And I mean that about EVERYTHING

Gmail is lame, their search engine sucks, chrome wastes resources, their ads platform ruined the internet, Golang fundamentally sucks, the emulation layer of android is so fucking wasteful, Material Design ruined digital creativity, etc.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] nature_man@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Reposting my comment another post relating to this situation

I mean this is just them making official how they've been acting for 2 years minimum, as much as google and youtube want to act progressive and inclusive, people still get demonetized for talking about lgbtq or women's issues, unless they are harassing them, in which case the video will stay up no matter how many of youtube's rules it breaks. For example, trans NB game critic Stephanie Sterling had multiple harassment videos against them (they listed pronouns as they/them last I checked, please correct if changed) that are still up right now, several years after upload, despite those videos exclusively attacking them for being trans/non-binary, which breaks youtube's TOS

Companies are not your friend.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MasterReflection1916@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Look at the latest executive order on "protecting children". They are planning for eugenics.

load more comments
view more: next ›