The rules of no directories and super-small crates seem kinda silly to me but I guess Google's build system is special enough that it makes sense for them.
How do you know that data is authentic?
How else can you be sure the content is valid though? Lemmy posts are sent as Announces from the community, not from the actor posting the post. The community could just fake a post if you just trust it.
That's not true, you know the data hasn't been tampered with because of HTTP signatures. The fediverse isn't just "yolo, just trust me bro". There are some parts that are a bit more towards that side (particularly with groups on Lemmy) but I don't think this should be.
It in fact would, because there would be no incentive to keep it like it is - it would never have been made so bad if it was a democratic decision.
Facebook and Co. is bad today because there's a conflict of interest between users and shareholders, and Zuckerberg chose the shareholders cause they line his pockets. This conflict would not exist if it was democratic.
deeply antisocial
It doesn't really have to be. The problem is that the profits that comes from that machine are not spread among the working people - that would be the social way to implement it.
Rogue AI is akin to a car handbrake failing.
The handbrake is a critical security feature of cars to make sure the car doesn't roll downhill and kill someone. If a handbrake failed to stop the car, we would put the blame squarely on the car manufacturer and we would require strict standards and regulations for car handbrakes.
Containing an AI system with proper security measures is the same. It is not "rogue AI", it is "insufficient and careless security" by the AI company in question. If those security measures fail, of course the blame sits at the AI company.
If a car handbrake fails, we would not be talking about a "rogue car". That's ridiculous.
Someone on Twitter is saying that the username for the fridges was "admin" and that the password was the current date... Prime security in effect here, clearly /s
I think you're conflating consciousness and intelligence. I think you could theoretically have an artificial general intelligence on the same level of intelligence as a human, or even beyond, but with zero consciousness. We know that intelligence does not follow consciousness (unless you believe a fish or a cow is not conscious). Why should consciousness follow intelligence?
Yea really it's more a distinction between indie games and AAA games. The indie scene has never been better honestly.
Some snakes do indeed strangle their prey. It stands to reason that if the snakes body can withstand the tension of strangling when the snake is itself the initiator, it can withstand the same tension when used as a rope. I would think the forces involved are largely the same, perhaps aside from the places where the strangler grabs the snake.
8
Announcing a Maintainer in Residence: Scott Schafer for the Cargo team | Rust Blog
(blog.rust-lang.org)
50
Google's "Painful To Maintain" Binder C Linux Driver Being Removed In Favor Of Rust
(www.phoronix.com)
view more: next ›
Real: Anon can improve himself by going outside.
Straight: Anon talked to women.