SorteKanin

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

So is air cooling actually feasible but we don't do it cause it would make data centers look like nuclear reactors? Or is it just not feasible?

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

I think there would be a whole lot of excitement, possibly a lot of religious turmoil.

I'd recommend the movie "Contact" which explores this exact scenario :)

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What do you mean "meet"? The way we would reach contact is by radio signals at first, not by actual physical visits. So at first we would only be communicating with probably a very long light delay as they'd be very far away. Realistically speaking neither would be able to visit the other in any feasible way, unless they have technology that is far, far beyond what we can imagine right now. Interstellar travel is very hard.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Personally think it's just really not the software's job to handle this or have an opinion on this - it's rather up to the instance admins to decide.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 8 points 6 days ago

I suppose if you have an instance wide policy against AI moderation, then any mod using AI for moderation is going against the rules. But what anyone "should" do on their own instance is really up to them.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 5 points 6 days ago

They don't need to federate even, they're probably already scraping everything.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago

I got one, just keep spamming continue, it will eventually go through!

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 26 points 1 week ago (5 children)

As a dane, this explains a lot with all the weird stuff you hear about the US these days.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago

People think consensually drinking your partner’s breast milk is wrong

Wait, they do? Why? What could possibly be wrong with that?

The idea of a consent waiver for post death sex is... A strange, uncomfortable thought. At the same time, I cannot really see any moral problem with that, per se. It's kind of in the same category of being in a relationship with a sibling with no intention of getting children. Strange, slightly uncomfortable to consider, but hard to see any actual moral problem with it.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Have these people actually ever compared the anonymous internet with the named internet? Facebook is flooded with bigots and idiots that readily spout racist and hateful words, with their full name in plain sight. Meanwhile, anonymous places like Reddit are far better moderated (yes, I know we hate on reddit here but it is much better moderated than Facebook). Same applies to most of the fediverse.

I suspect these people haven't actually used these anonymous places on the internet much. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 1 week ago

... until now.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because any normal person would want it upper cased. Most people never type these folder names.

Yes, Linux should appeal to the masses, otherwise we will never get rid of Windows. No, this doesn't apply to anyone on Lemmy cause nobody on Lemmy right now truly qualify as "normal person", statistically speaking.

18
Rust Koans (users.rust-lang.org)
 

I am not the author but I've been looking for a tool like this for a long time! This looks really nice! :D

 

There was recently some discussion on Feddit.dk surrounding the usage of upvotes and downvotes.

Currently in ActivityPub (the underlying protocol powering the fediverse), Lemmy sends "Like" and "Dislike" activities for upvotes and downvotes. Other threadiverse platforms (PieFed, Mbin and maybe even other non-threadiverse platforms?) do the same.

However, the "Like" and "Dislike" activities are meant for... well, "liking" and "disliking" things. They are not necessarily associated with the action of "vote this thing up so more people see it" or "vote this thing down so less people see it".

For instance, on Friendica, you can dislike a post and this sends a Dislike activity. From Friendica's point of view, such a Dislike indicates just that - the user dislikes the content. It doesn't necessarily mean "this should be shown to less users", but Lemmy will interpret the Dislike activity like that.

This leads to strange scenarios with posts that a user finds relevant and interesting (something that the user may reasonably want to upvote) but also something that the user dislikes (i.e. downvote).

As an example, imagine a post with a title like "AI is awful" (I'm sure many here has seen posts like that). A Friendica user could reasonably agree with the post and thus "Dislike" it. As in, they also find AI awful and they dislike AI, so they dislike the post, to show their disapproval of AI. The Friendica user's intent is not to hide the post from other users or make the post be shown to fewer users! They just intend to show their dislike for the topic at hand.

However Lemmy will interpret that Dislike as a downvote, and the post will thus be shown to fewer users and get ranked down in the sorting.

So is Lemmy and co. abusing the Like/Dislike activities? Should the threadiverse instead use a dedicated activity for the acts of "I think this should be shown to more users" and "I think this should be shown to fewer users"? That way, it would not be confused with the Likes and Dislikes from other platforms.

view more: next ›