this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
344 points (88.4% liked)

Programming.dev Meta

2466 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the Programming.Dev meta community!

This is a community for discussing things about programming.dev itself. Things like announcements, site help posts, site questions, etc. are all welcome here.

Links

Credits

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I will no longer be able to assist with development nor debugging actual issues with the software... Quite juvenile behavior from the devs. It stemmed from this issue where the devs continuously argued in public by opening and closing an issue. Anyway, thought I would keep y'all apprised of the situation, since these are the people maintaining the software you are currently using.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] starman@programming.dev 131 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think that you should update your post with information that this ban is only for 7 days.

This:

I will no longer be able to assist with development

suggests that ban is infinite, which is not true.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah but if you were in this position would really want to contribute again? It's virtually an indefinite ban when the reason is this absurd.

[–] starman@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yes, If I would contribute to lemmy, I wouldn't do it for the devs, but for the software and its users.

EDIT: But don't think that I support nutomic's reaction to OP's comments.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Unwilling =/= Unable, this is transparent sophistry

[–] snowe@programming.dev 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where do you see that information? I didn’t even know it was possible to do this until last night so not sure how I’m supposed to know how long it lasts.

[–] starman@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, I assumed that github shows it to you somehow. I know about it from nutomic's comment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mao@lemmy.sdf.org 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Idk I think y'all are a bit too dramatic lol. Imho you're reading too much into a small aggression. This has nothing to do with the future of Lemmy or anything as grandiose as that

[–] snowe@programming.dev 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This has nothing to do with the future of Lemmy or anything as grandiose as that

I didn't say it did. I mentioned that it would affect me, the person who runs the server you're commenting on. That's it.

[–] mao@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was referring to other commenters, mb should've been clearer about it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] August27th@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

nothing to do with the future of Lemmy

Let's not go that far. That said, it's certainly not everything to do with it either. Let's call it an indicator and keep an eye on it.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago

Quite juvenile behavior from the devs.

The constant closing and reopening the issue was a bit weird but I didn't really see any hostility or toxic behavior, except from you getting pissy about it out of nowhere.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Looks like snowe missed the fact that each of those close/reopens were months apart, so it's clear the issue would ge re-opened, still not addressed after many many months, then closed to clean up the backlog, then re-opened because it actually still has value.

Snowe it seems interpreted this as two people fighting and not just normal stuff that happens on giant repos with many devs.

What he did wrong was comment about behaviors/edicit on a PR, which is not the appropriate place to have that convo.

PR comments are for talking about the PR, not for having meta convos about comments on PRs.

I don't even participate in this repo, but I can say that snowe was off topic here.

However the owner's reaction of a whopping seven day ban and "learn your lesson" comment was also abrasive and unreasonable.

Both sides fucked up here, get ya'lls shit together and apologize to each other yo.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mark@programming.dev 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Dude, who in their right mind would add scheduling infra to a client like that? 😆 I'm going to need these Lemmy devs to have a tad bit more experience before they start being so dismissive, especially to someone who's just trying to help.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you actually /banned/ front participating on GitHub? That seems really petty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Lemmy needs a fork, if only to kick the devs into gear with regards to actually working with/listening to the community. At this point a significant number of users have been lost because the devs have been largely unable to capitalize on previous waves on growth due to slow development. It's one thing if it's just a couple of devs working on the project and trying their best, it's an entirely different thing when a couple of devs are shutting out large numbers of contributors (frequently subject matter experts which they desperately need at this point) over relatively trivial issues. This isn't the first time this has happened and it won't be the last. Mbin is reviving Kbin as a project and we need something similar for Lemmy.

load more comments (5 replies)

Just an all round juvenile behaviour from the devs. Would expect a project like this to be more properly managed.

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry, which account is yours?

[–] sovietknuckles@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's inflamatory about it? Genuine question.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] subignition@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

They are the account whose comment is collapsed as off-topic

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is ridiculously petty from the devs, and does make me seriously wonder about Lemmy's future.

[–] kugel7c@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk if they care about a particular thing FOOS devs are often petty. I don't think it's actually a threat to the project. Like read unix mailing lists from Linus or whoever else, it can get downright toxic. e.g.:

"BULLSHIT. Have you looked at the patches you are talking about? You should have - several of them bear your name. [...] As it is, the patches are COMPLETE AND UTTER GARBAGE. [...] WHAT THE F*CK IS GOING ON? " here

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think Linus gets away with a lot because the value Linux delivers is pretty out of this world.

Being rude to people trying to contribute in good faith seems like a way to send them to a competitor and if one exists, that doesn’t bode well for the project.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] xan1242@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hmm, where have I seen that before? Oh yeah, on PCSX2.

Your time and talent is better spent elsewhere. Don't even think about this any longer.

You wanted to help and they acted in this way. You made yourself clear, so it’s on them to reevaluate.

Your time isn’t free, so don’t spend it on stupid people. I know you’re passionate and want to help, but sometimes it unfortunately comes down to this.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›