this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
499 points (98.8% liked)

politics

23037 readers
3357 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic National Committee vice chair David Hogg's plan to spend $20 million to primary older Democratic incumbents in Congress has sparked intense anger from some lawmakers.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TemplaerDude@lemm.ee 44 points 2 days ago

Any other job where you fail as hard and as often as those old fossils do, you get the fucking boot. Why do they think they're entitled to their fucking seat? You fucked up and have been responsible for having the world's worst person elected twice now. Time to go.

[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Thank you, David Hogg. So glad you survived the school shooting. 👍

He is trying to get rid of the dead wood.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (18 children)

Frankly this is a good idea in the long term despite a possible short term loss.

The Tea Party hurt the Republicans in the short term, but they took over the party and purged the liberal elements. They replaced Eric Cantor with a speaker who does everything they want. They’re a monolithic block now and have been winning out on their strategies ever since.

AOC ousted 10-term congressman Joe Crowley in a primary by a huge margin. A few more of those couldn’t hurt.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The "intense anger" tells you this is absolutely the right thing to do.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (33 children)

"What a disappointment from leadership. I can think of a million better things to do with twenty million dollars right now," swing-district Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Mich.) told Axios.

"Fighting Democrats might get likes online, but it's not what restores majorities," she added.

The issue is we get majorities and then nothing gets done with depresses turnout.

We don't want to primary these old conservatives, we'd much rather them represent their constituents, but they've shown time and time again they won't.

We'd rather they get out of the way and resign, but they won't put the future of the party over their own personal power.

So fuck em.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

God the more I learn about this kid the more I am impressed and behind his every move!

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Can you tell me more about him? This is the first time I've heard of him and I can't find much online.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Anger because they're useless and they're being called out.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

If you were confident that you've done right by the people you represent then surely you wouldn't be threatened by challenges to your incumbency.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let me guess - the older lawmakers who voted for some of Trump’s cabinet nominations?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where do I donate to David Hogg?

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 days ago

Leaders We Deserve is his PAC which is funding this primary challenge initiative.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Here it is. The democrats they say are fine. Squibbling over 20 million. Please, are you the second most powerful political force in America or are you just a bunch of sphistocrats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I love his energy, but I sincerely disagree with the whole gun control narrative right now. Leaning into that when there are about to be a shitload of far right militias deputized is an absolutely fucking idiotic plan.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I get it, but this is where he comes from, I thought the same thing you did until I read this.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

So like… I was in my early thirties when this happened. I know. I remember. I watched some of the news livestreams as it went down.

I said what I said understanding that.

I am by no means trying to diminish, demean, discredit, disparage, or otherwise detract from his experience. Im saying that I am very fucking concerned that an actual war is coming, and disarming right before a war is a great fucking way to get killed.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

And I hear you, and may even agree, I was just sharing this guys Pov

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

has sparked intense anger from some lawmakers.

Who gives a shit. What do potential voters think?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›