this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
30 points (96.9% liked)

Vancouver

1444 readers
1 users here now

Community for the city of Vancouver, BC

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The police in Vancouver seem to have an anti-drug stick up their ass lately...

Not only that, but going after the cleanest sources and largely ignoring the dirtier ones. Quite counterproductive.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Counterproductive is dependent on your objectives...

Want to lazily flex your power and bully people you don't like? Perfect.

Want to make society better safer and freer? Not so much.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No business license selling right now illegal drugs of course it was going to happen.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sure - does that change my point in the slightest?

[–] villasv@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The police in Vancouver seem to have an anti-drug stick up their ass lately…

They will always have, they're cops. What changed is the friendlier political climate towards letting it show. With Ken Sim and the ABC having the council in hand, this is a second order effect. That's the "tough on crime" supposed to solve the shortcomings of previous administrations.

OTOH, traffic enforcement cameras get the "let's study this" death sentence, like bike infrastructure tends to have. When the matter is speeding or running red lights, the "tough on crime" energy disappears.

[–] AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo 2 points 1 year ago

Spending money on infrastructure to prevent pedestrian and cyclist deaths? I sleep.

Spending money on raiding storefronts that sell clean drugs? REAL SHIT

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Gotta justify hiring all those cops after the election.

[–] banana 10 points 1 year ago

Ultimately a waste of police resources.