this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
192 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New videos of Tesla Cybertruck off-roading appear to show it struggling to climb up a steep dirt hill::One video showed a 1946 Jeep CJ-2A successfully navigating the same hill that the Cybertruck struggled to summit.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 153 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Crap article that doesn’t even have the video in question. Here it is. The Cybertruck sure does look unimpressive in the video. It’s making weird rattling sounds too. This thing looks like a shit box.

[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The noises are someone in the background, not coming from the truck

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think you’re right; seems like it’s coming from the guy putting his car on a trailer. Cybertruck still looks like it’s not cut out for off roading though

[–] Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look at the tires, they are pretty suboptimal.

I switched to an EV 3 years ago and there is way too much torque at low rpm. The power curve just probably isn't designed for loose dirt. Not to mention the cyber truck weighs a billion pounds.

[–] bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The torque issue would be really easy to fix. The beauty of EVs is everything is computer controlled, so it'd be as simple as programming in a "low" mode by making the motors deliver power/torque on a much more gradual curve relative to pedal input (emulating a traditional gearboxes low range gears). The weight might be less of an issue at that point, although it's still going to be a problem no matter how you slice it

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Yes lower RPM of the tires and some sort of electronic locker front and rear would probably make this perform much better.

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It kinda looks like a golf cart wrapped in foil

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

cut-out, hah

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feels like very few trucks and "offroad-ready" vehicles nowadays are actually cut out for real offroading

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

They should 100% be able to handle that offroading...my Elantra would be able to get up that hill better then that deformed junk pile

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My only defense of the Cybertruck will be that it isn't the thing making the rattling sound (or the squeaking noise). That's the sound of the tilt-bed trailer you see toward the end of the video, that some guy is putting his jeep onto. However your assessment that it looks unimpressive is spot on. It looks like a lumbering, inelegant heap (more so than most pickups) and it moves like a Power Wheels.

[–] daed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly, it is! It's big, it's lumbering, it's heavy AF. Somehow, with small-arms resistant steel for doors, it's 2000 lbs lighter than the Hummer EV and I would still have expected the Hummer to have less trouble with that hill. Hard to tell from this video though honestly - an inexperienced off-roader in a Jeep/Raptor/whatever could have had just as much trouble as the Cybertruck did here.

I think Tesla is struggling with the cybertruck. They have a lot of skills and lessons learned from their other vehicles, but a truck is completely different in use case. They seem out of their depth here.

Disclaimer: I'm not an Elon/Tesla hater. I want to see them succeed for a number of reasons. I want to like the Cybertruck. It ain't there yet.

[–] Dippy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had a guy on one of my old delivery routes that had a WWII jeep he restored a drove everywhere. That thing was absolutely amazing!

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I think the closest modern equivalent is the Suzuki Jimny. This small car goes anywhere.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure it's ability is what everyone is trying to recreate with their modern rogs.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh... where are the headlights on that thing?

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't need them, it uses the reflected light of other cars to see.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It is designed so brilliant lights are redundant.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Criticizes the "no-video article". Posts Meta link :/
But yeah, that's a bucket-o-bolts!

[–] vind@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I mean that is the source.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They're super heavy, not something you want over rough terrain...

Last year a woman driving a Honda EV got stuck in the snow near me. My nephew, my brothers, myself and two of my sisters tried to push it out of the snow bank. We barely managed with a lot of shoveling and traction aids.

With any other car two of us would have had it out in five minutes. The weight of those batteries is a problem

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

God damn is that thing ugly as fucking sin. It’s like they went out of their way to make it as fucking ugly as possible.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's kind of cool in a retro futurism kind of way but no shot I'd be rolling around in that thing.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I unironically like it.

However, it does need to have an automated machine gun turret to actually tie the aesthetic together.

[–] Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate Elon Musk and I still like the cybertruck.

I'm ashamed but I'd probably buy one and be happy with it, 100% in the city, doing mostly light hobby work, towing a boat, or locally camping.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Don't hate him enough to not fork over a ton of cash to his pocket for the uglymobile

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It looks like it came from the Battlestar Galactica 1980s tv series prop collection. Should come with a robot dog.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It has worse aerodynamics than a Jeep Wrangler, too.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It has worse aerodynamics than a double wide getting pulled down the freeway.

[–] Hoomod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you have worse aerodynamics than two bricks stacked on top of each other

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here you go

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

And the Jeep Gladiator. Combined. lol

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny if true. Have a source?

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is one stupid ugly vehicle.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Definitelt ain't winning any style or beauty awards.

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Uhhh check the difference in the tires on the two vehicles, pretty sure that makes a difference

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

I think that the most difference is the weight of the two vehicles.... Most modern cars are way too heavy, and the cybertruck is an extreme example of bloat

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It comes down to having tires sized to carry the weight. A heavy vehicle would need tires the size of those Russian off-road vehicles to match the light Jeep. Also why light offroad vehicles like a Polaris side-by-side are so popular now with people that drive trails. And why you would never want to take those lifted full-sized trucks off road even though they are popular on the highway.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While it's pretty pathetic that a modern 4WD system can't control wheel slip quicker than that, those drivers obviously don't have a clue what they're doing.

[–] Jamie@jamie.moe 3 points 1 year ago

Driver definitely didn't look confident in their ability or seem to have any kind of plan.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

It looks like the driver was struggling more than the vehicle

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Didn't it struggle climbing a curb? What makes them think it can off-road?

[–] imgprojts@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only difference is that when it comes to repairing the clutch on the jeep, you can just go get a coffee with your Tesla because it doesn't have one. I bet that the Tesla just needs a lower gear to win that competition. The jeep wins because it's very light and has a low gear.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Repairing a clutch in a jeep like that isn't a big deal. Those things were actually designed to be repaired in the field easily.