this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39598 readers
314 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 61 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

pot calling the kettle black are we

(I just googled this phrase since to be honest I didn't know its origins and I really prefer the 1639 version "Pot calling the pan burnt-arsed" now)

[–] zzzzz@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

Pot calling the pan burnt-arsed

Thank you for this!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skies5394@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Slides from 20 years ago.

This is news, yes, especially considering that Apple made a deal with the devil considering its new self-reported bloom as privacy focused.

But news headlines are acting like Apple just said this today, and that is complete headline bait.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

10 years ago, I dont think android was released on 2003.

The 2013-era slides describe, in typical modest fashion for Apple, its overall approach at the time to privacy.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yet Apple gladly takes billions from Google so that they remain the default search engine.

[–] lisko@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 years ago

Says Apple lol

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I guess what that slide meant was not what the author thought.

Well, yes, Android is a "massive tracking device", but Google Search is not the culprit. Android apps were able to collect user data easily because they didn't have to ask for users' permission (and even today, by using an old Android API iirc).

So, no, I don't trust Apple, but that slide is probably irrelevant.

[–] chrismit3s@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

and even today, by using an old Android API iirc

Nope, the required API to have your app in the Playstore constantly rises, and if you don't comply you get kicked. The current API version is something around 26, and definitely has the permissions model integrated.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but you can distribute your app outside and the official store then

[–] CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

They're also adding an API version check on devices, which will affect old apps that have gotten around the store checks. Only affects devices that can upgrade to 14, but it's a solid step.

[–] SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

eh, anything Apple says about direct competition is a lie. every time

[–] zzzzz@beehaw.org 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, in this case, it is a lie of omission. It is true that Android devices are massive trackers. But, so are Apple devices.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

At least we know about it.

[–] Idirian@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

Will, they would, wouldn't they. Tossers.