this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
1020 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

31981 readers
322 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't really use facebook anymore so couldn't care less; but so happened to log in today to change my password and saw this on my front page.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 341 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Ad Blocking is Cyber Security, never ever let anyone convince you differently

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 143 points 1 year ago (6 children)

if ads were just static PNGs with a link you went to if you clicked I wouldn't have ever bothered. but ads became a major malware and tracking risk so plugging that security hole became mandatory.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 year ago

I tried finding that website, but I can't remember what it is. I've seen it use the static image advertisement. It changed on each reload too.

But yes, that website had last update somewhere in the early 2000s.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's true. I work in a computer shop and we see literally thousands and thousands of dollars lost from people clicking on ads that look like normal buttons (things like "Download", "Next", etc). And not just the elderly either. Everyone has a a combination of inputs to get scared and comply. Folks that are otherwise extremely competent and savvy can get scammed too.

The best security you can have online is adblockers, only beaten by using trusted websites.

Edit, fair points with sites being slimy these days. I meant using legitimate versions of websites rather than copy/fake websites designed to steal credentials.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I dunno', the way Google themselves have served vulnerable ads, it might be true that ad blocking is more important than using "trustworthy" sites.

[–] hstde@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But what websites can you trust these days?

YouTube? Serves up scammy bitcoin ads. Google? Places ads as "search results" Twitter?

Maybe that one website unchanged since 1998.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 29 points 1 year ago

Definitely. Ads are eye cancer at best, and infiltration channels for malware at worst. Compromised ad networks pumping out executable code via javascript (or back in the days, Flash) are still a major source of trojan infections.

[–] Teon@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And just to add to your important point, Ad Blockers are really Content Blockers. They allow the user to delete annoyances that have nothing to do with advertising. We should all start calling them Content Blockers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have said it before, snd I will repeat it as many times as it takes.

Adblocking is security, untill website owners take legal and financial responsibillity for the harm that a hacked ad spreading malware or attenpting any kind of deception, I won't even consider removing my adblocker.

If this changes, I will consider it, but will still not do it, the risk to my data is too large.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reflex_aliens@lemmy.ml 150 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Seems like a feature to me.

[–] purple@lemm.ee 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah aunt Greta, I’m still friends with you, but it’s so weird how I can’t see your anti vax “facts”

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 year ago

That's the government censorship!

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I took a peek at my feed for the first time in years. It's all junk lol, no one I care about is posting anything

The only thing worth seeing is my local Buy Nothing group, but there are other services popping up which do something similar.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi 139 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your ad blocker is blocking posts from friends

Thank fucking god

[–] Ronnie@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My Facebook is hardly even friends these days. It's basically ads, suggested posts, and posts in groups. Maybe because none of my friends really post anymore, I dunno.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CJOtheReal@lemmy.sdf.org 84 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Ok but who the fuck uses Facebook?

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I think people are underestimating how important the YouTube thing is.

If they succeed, the entire ad funded internet are going to clone what they do.

It will effect everyone everywhere, whether you run an adblocker or not.

It will benefit the large corporations and choke out the smaller people. It will consolidate control and wealth.

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly and I think what we are seeing here is that the other companies are now helping build a very frustrating user experience to break down the everyday user. We will likely see Twitter and others joining in the coming weeks

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] M500@lemmy.ml 66 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Other than YouTube, I’m basically off all of these centralized social media platforms and it feels great.

I do need to occasionally use Facebook for market place and messenger for contacting business.

Basically every business operates over messenger where I live.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 55 points 1 year ago (12 children)

So this is how it will start.

First it will be a back and forth war of Anti-adblockers vs Adblockers

Then when the Anti-Adblockers start to lose, which they will, then they'll come crying to various governments with massic PAC campaigns among other insane garbage about how "Adblockers are Piracy!" and that they need to be banned.

This will not end well.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (10 children)

It'll end well enough. People will just stop using their shitty platforms. They'll start looking for alternatives, from which there are loads, find that there are platforms that don't require ads, and go there.

Those that stay deserve the shit they get

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

LOL, if you block ads they'll hide a message from one of your friends that you never would have seen anyway because it would've been buried in ads.

I think this is good though. I think this is just what a lot of people need to get them off FB. I mean... have you tried surfing the www without an ad blocker? I'd rather not use the www.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 year ago

Stop using Facebook.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Oh no, I have to stop using Facebook too? Holy shit I might get something done

You guys should implement that shit here on Lemmy too

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 year ago

I'd rather have some false positives than a single unblocked ad.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It’s been for a long time but not overtly. (I’ve never used it, this is someone else’s screenshot)


Facebook splitting the word "Sponsored" to bypass adblockers – r/assholedesign

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RQG@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I don't think any other site can do what YouTube is doing, because YouTube is almost impossible to replace and find an alternative to. If Facebook pulls this I'm out for good. The only reason I'm on there still is the 3 people who refuse to use anything else that I still care about.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So they're essentially admitting that their advertisements are indistinguishable from your friend's posts which are the actual reason you visit the site in the first place. It doesn't matter anyway anymore. Facebook has buried friends list content among absolute bullshit you have zero desire to see. I visited a while ago and 99% of what I was shown was ridiculous groups I tried to block. But there are millions of them. You can block a thousand groups and there's 999 thousand more that are just like it, waiting to take their place. Facebook is supposed to have this super algorithm that determines what users want to see. If that's the case, why are they incapable of detecting that I am actively opposed to certain types of content? Maybe they think they're going to outrage me enough to engage on this bullshit? Nah, I'll just leave. Bye, fuck-faces.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

They ain’t my friends if they be posting ads.

[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Can anyone please get my country off Facebook and Messenger? Please?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 27 points 1 year ago (9 children)

How does one block a post from a friend with an ad-blocker? Do some of your friends type like shills? Is Facebook making numbers up for fun?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's probably made-up garbage. If they knew my ad-blocker had actually blocked a friend, I'm sure they would have found a way not to get anything blocked.

Or alternatively they are now displaying some friend's posts on the same channel normally reserved for ad networks so they are indistinguishable via software? But then it should be way more than one, unless this is some early A/B testing crap.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol what.. my feed is 80% ads, 15% group posts and maybe 5% friends

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] milo128@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

this is such an insidious way to stop people from using ad blockers. It's not like facebook isn't deliberately making sure these false positives happen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

100% of the ads i saw on facebook that i can remember were scams

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be funny if the ad blocking community just ignored this, and focused on removing FB tracking on external sites.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ByroTriz@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Good. Facebook should just die.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's like all these tech companies wait to deploy this stuff at the same time.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As soon as one has the audacity to deploy anti-consumer bullshit and the others see there's no measurable fallback, they all rush to roll out the same shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tmmk@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So all my “friends” are actually ads?

Guess I don’t need to use Facebook

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ari-Zahavi227@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Great for the internet! More people will install an adblocker (hopefully ublock origin).

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›