user224

joined 2 years ago
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 21 hours ago

Bunch of popups and sketchy redirections

It's comments like this that make you figure out that your adblock works.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 23 hours ago

Problem with plain Wireguard is if you can't open ports on some devices to get a direct connection. It should be just fine with hub and spoke model, but NAT Traversal of Tailscale makes a huge difference. I can get a direct connection between 2 devices connected to mobile data and behind CG-NAT.
And also the config management if you have too many devices.

Hub and spoke, you just add new devices to Wireguard on the main device, and the new peer. Full mesh, oof.

But as far as configuring Wireguard goes, that's pretty simple. And then there's the weird stuff with MTU and fragmentation... but that's not something Wireguard-specific.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 day ago

And even if you don't care, if you have an old machine booting from a HDD, the process at least isn't so boring.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, just reminded me of this.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 1 day ago (5 children)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 day ago

There's always someone in the family who will name a better kid and keep comparing you, the inferior to all child.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I went with Google.

Edit: I am just saying what I went with. I didn't have another fitting option.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

Choice is good. Back when smartphones were still small (3 - 4 inches), I instead bought a 7" tablet with modem and used it as a phone. It was still small enough to fit in a pocket.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can get that in most Chinese phones. The IR blaster, that is.
There's even some brands that have crazy phones, like Unihertz, Doogee and Ulefone. You can even get one with a projector.

Unihertz specifically makes special phones.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 91 points 1 day ago (6 children)

If I can get GrapheneOS + headphone jack + SD card slot, I am in.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

I got them here: https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0DLPHFVLP

I've also seen them in Kaufland, but they were €3.29/pack.

 
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get what you’re going for here. But another caveat to add would be that the people in this sort of relationship shouldn’t have children.

Which is in my 1st sentence.

 

As usual, the answer is alcohol.
This DVD burned fine, but didn't read. I pressed my nail into the side to separate the 2 disc sections, then played around with it*, and finally stripped both the purple dye and reflective layer with isopropyl alcohol.

*I of course tried what it would do if re-inserted into the DVD drive. Single half wouldn't spin up. The spindle didn't have good enough grip. Placing the half with reflective layer back on top surprisingly made it read as a blank DVD, showing its (past) properties.
Trying to burn it again, unsurprisingly, resulted in I/O error.

 

 

At the end of 2023, the source code of GTA V has leaked. There were also some guides to build it from source.

Does anyone know if it was used in some way?

Just remembered it today when cleaning my phone's nearly full SD card, and GTAVSP.7z said hello.

 

I like the idea of X forwarding, but it doesn't work in real world anymore. As far as I know, it has to do many round-trips for everything. Launching something like LibreOffice Writer is funny, it will be loading bit by bit, icon by icon for several minutes. It was only usable for me on < 1ms network.

Unlike say VNC, it opens windows locally.

And now there's Waypipe which does the same thing, but for Wayland. And it actually works! Even better than VNC.

BUT, it doesn't work for X programs. It can somewhat work with rootful Xwayland... but that's basically a desktop for X-only programs.

Welp, I just wanted to check something on the remote desktop, so I launched VNC, and WOAH, I didn't expect to get XFCE invasion.
I didn't know XFCE can do Wayland now.

Anyway, this cursed thing does actually work pretty fine. xfce4-session works with Waypipe, good to know.

 
 

I accidentally untarred archive intended to be extracted in root directory, which among others included some files for /etc directory.
I went on to rm -rv ~/etc, but I quickly typed rm -rv /etc instead, and hit enter, while using a root account.

 

Edit 3: Tested with wg-quick on Arch, same issue re-occurs. So, let's say we have a peer on 192.168.1.1/24 with internal (wireguard) IP of 10.0.0.1/24, but we also want to route through it to rest of 192.168.1.0/24.
Instead of nice AllowedIPs = 10.0.0.0/24,192.168.1.0/24, it would have to be:
AllowedIPs = 10.0.0.0/24, 192.168.1.1/32, 192.168.1.2/31, 192.168.1.4/30, 192.168.1.8/29, 192.168.1.16/28, 192.168.1.32/27, 192.168.1.64/26, 192.168.1.128/25
Or there's something else going wrong. I only tried on Arch. Welp, as I said, it's not a thing that occurs with WG Tunnel on Android.

Edit 2: Hypothesis confirmed. Excluding the endpoint from AllowedIPs in NetworkManager solves the issue. However, this isn't a problem with 0.0.0.0/0, nor with WG Tunnel app on Android. I'll have to check with wg-quick. That seems most official.
Summary: NetworkManager tries to route traffic to WG peer over the same WG interface, and its /32 has to be excluded.

Edit: I noticed one thing, I'll try excluding the peer endpoint from AllowedIPs. It seems weird if it tries to connect to it over the interface between the 2 peers, which is of course impossible, but maybe? However, it is not matched by 0.0.0.0/0. Welp, time to experiment.

So, for 2 years I thought that NetworkManager Wireguard implementation is simply broken.
When I used a list of address ranges, like I should be (and am) able to do with Wireguard, I couldn't get any traffic through, however 0.0.0.0/0,::/0 would work.

Today I discovered something... interesting. It actually works... with a smaller list of AllowedIPs. Although even a larger list still ends up being shown by ip r.
So I went to AllowedIPs calculator as usual, created a desired list, pasted it in, and started removing IP ranges until I could ping a remote peer.

Problem solved? Well, no. I hoped it would be the limitation in number of routes, but it (also) seems to depend on route size.

Examples:
This is too much:
0.0.0.0/5,8.0.0.0/7,11.0.0.0/8,12.0.0.0/6,16.0.0.0/4,32.0.0.0/3,64.0.0.0/2,128.0.0.0/3,160.0.0.0/5,168.0.0.0/6,172.0.0.0/12,172.32.0.0/11,172.64.0.0/10,172.128.0.0/9,10.147.0.0/24
Removing one of the routes, 172.128.0.0/9 makes it work.
0.0.0.0/5,8.0.0.0/7,11.0.0.0/8,12.0.0.0/6,16.0.0.0/4,32.0.0.0/3,64.0.0.0/2,128.0.0.0/3,160.0.0.0/5,168.0.0.0/6,172.0.0.0/12,172.32.0.0/11,172.64.0.0/10,10.147.0.0/24

Time for mystery start. Keeping the same number of routes, but decreasing the size of one of them (second last) also makes it work:
0.0.0.0/5,8.0.0.0/7,11.0.0.0/8,12.0.0.0/6,16.0.0.0/4,32.0.0.0/3,64.0.0.0/2,128.0.0.0/3,160.0.0.0/5,168.0.0.0/6,172.0.0.0/12,172.32.0.0/11,172.64.0.0/10,172.128.0.0/10,10.147.0.0/24

Naturally, I tried breaking up 172.128.0.0/9 into 172.128.0.0/10 and 172.192.0.0/10, which breaks it again.

So, it seems to depend on both number and size of the routes. After all, larger ones alone worked.

132
Vim Diesel (i.imgur.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by user224@lemmy.sdf.org to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

Catbox appears broken, so Imgur again.

 

Just came up with my father again.
He blames me that mother forgot her phone's and Google password because I recommended against it being a word.
I mentioned encryption, "not necessary unless you're doing something illegal".
When mentioning lack of privacy with targeted advertisements, he said that he actually really likes them, because he bought a couple of things he wanted for years.

I don't really have good arguments.

 

Domain names seem expensive in comparison. The cheaper VPS that I use for playing around is just $10.29/year.
I thought I'd get a domain name from RackNerd as well, but they're $24.95/year + I think $4.99 for privacy.

I've checked Namecheap, and that seemed great, until I found that renewal prices are often through the roof.

I don't really care about it being nice. For now, mostly I just want to use the VPS as image host for Lemmy, since Imgur and Catbox are both a bit problematic.
And without a domain name, the images only show as link posts in the default LemmyUI (though it seems to work elsewhere). Plus it makes migration impossible.

 

Yeah, they overlap since I did whole hour (120 30-second codes). I didn't know specific time, so it's 2 pages, 3 hours, 42 minutes and 30 seconds.

Credit goes to oathtool (and LibreOffice Write).
Font: Liberation Mono

view more: next ›