this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
324 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

14451 readers
3225 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Made this meme while studying CP violation in weak interactions... weak force why cant you be normal?? :cry:

Credit for the image on the right: KhezuG on DevianArt

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quilan@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

For some further mind fuckery on the subject, I highly recommend this video on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkH1citHtgs. Dude never misses in interesting content.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

a 5 hour video? aint nobody got time for that

[–] will_a113@lemm.ee 126 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Shouldn’t gravity be like a tiny, vaguely dragon-shaped worm off in another field?

I mean messing with the strong force in a fistful of atoms gets you a nuclear bomb. Meanwhile, my old, achy self can jump up and resist against a whole earth’s worth of gravitational force.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

While that is true, for how long can you resist gravity? Gravity is the endurance hunter of the fundamental forces. Sure, you can lift your arm and resist the entire earth's gravity. But for how long, before you succumb to gravity's irresistible pull?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

resisting gravity is super easy, as evidenced by the fact that most things aren't black holes.

[–] Mesophar@pawb.social 2 points 5 hours ago

Perhaps the gravity head should be a snail then

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It's not a meme about the strength but about how complex the physics are.

The weak interaction breaks a lot of symmetries that hold in EM and strong interactions, like CP symmetry. Its gauge symmetry is also completely wild: SU(2)~L~ x U(1)~Y~, compared to U(1) for EM and SU(3) for the strong interaction. And finally there's also neutrino oscillations related to that. So to me the weak interaction is like a derpy brother to the other two.

Then gravity is something completely different and we are yet to figure out how to describe it in quantum physics. So that's why I chose that creature.

[–] muzzle@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The weak interaction is just electromagnetism if the photons had mass and charge (and broke CP and flavour simmetry, yeah). Above the unification scale they are literally the same field.

Plus, what really makes a theory hard is how hard it is to compute a prediction. There electroweak group is renormalizable. For the strong force you need to do weird lattice calculations.

I maintain that the strong force should be the derpy one.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I love that we're this far along in physics and the question of "what even is gravity anyway?" Is still fundamentally unsolved.

My favourite theory that I've seen so far is "entropy increases, and black holes have maximum entropy of anything in the universe, so everything is always trying to become a black hole." Stuff falls downward just because that's the easiest and most immediate way of making progress towards being a black hole.

Obviously, this is a layman's understanding.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting theory. On the other hand, if everything would diverge instead, like with the expansion of the universe, we also reach maximum entropy. So why wouldn't gravity be repellent?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

My understanding is it's because black holes are the way to maximum entropy. Widely dispersed material has lots of potential energy and lots of possible states, but black holes are "the end" - there's no further change possible once you get there. There is no state of matter or spacetime with more entropy than that.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

Ohh that makes quite a lot of sense. I always imagined entropy increase as more things are spread out, but i never considered gravity so turns out I was assuming repulsive(electromagnetic) forces when talking about entropy because we usually always considers a system of molecules

[–] will_a113@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago

Yup got it. In that context mega-dragon makes sense. I can’t wait until we actually understand what the hell gravity even is.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] archonet@lemy.lol 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Au contraire, mon frere. "Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space."

if you have enough mass moving quickly enough, someone's gonna have a real bad day. Gravity is fantastic for getting a lot of mass moving very quickly, it's why space missions slingshot around planets to get from A to B instead of burning propellant straight there. Even dropping tungsten rods from orbit can get you atom-bomb-sized explosions, and if you had any means of (even weakly) accelerating them before that, gravity would help further accelerate them.

That, and have you seen the amount of propellant required to overcome gravity? Compare that to the amount of fissile material you need to make a viable nuclear device. It's peanuts. A (small) nuke might as well be a rounding error compared to the amount of fuel you need to overcome gravity and leave earths orbit, gravity is that much of a fuck.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That, and have you seen the amount of propellant required to overcome gravity? Compare that to the amount of fissile material you need to make a viable nuclear device. It's peanuts.

You inadvertently argued against your point. It takes only a few kilograms of fissile material to generate the energy needed to escape the gravitation of the 6 billion trillion kilograms gravity of earth.

But not really because you only compared chemical energy to fission.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] will_a113@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was more just speaking to how it’s many orders of magnitude weaker than the other 3 forces. Though it does work on an infinite scale, so maybe it ought to be a tiny but unbelievably long vaguely dragon-shaped worm thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You didn't really overcome it though. After 2 seconds you got pulled right back.

[–] will_a113@lemm.ee 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. But try pulling a proton out of an atom for 2 seconds.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I can pull a Proton out and put it back in, as long as you're not observing me

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago

lol that sounds like a toddler saying "mom I can fly but i can only do it if you look away"

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

idk, man. that gravitational sigularity over there would like to have a word with you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muzzle@lemm.ee 28 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (8 children)

Are you kidding? The strong force depends on colours and increases with the distance, how is it not the derpy one?

The weak interaction is just electromagnetism if the photons had mass (and broke CP and flavour simmetry, yeah).

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago

I mean, increasing with distance isn't that bad, since it only increases upto a point and goes out of range.

I like that its analogous with springs and all, which also increases force with distance from mean position

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago

Color is just a word for a quantum property, not actual color.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Look man, the more I hear this argument the more I want to get into a Ph D program to figure out a better way to describe how fucking weird the Strong force is.

Sure, it "increases with distance" but the amount of energy you put in separating two particles bound by the strong force increases the probability of creating a new particle from the vacuum and then that distance snaps instantly. It has a practical limit if it is within the bounds of spacetime.

Edit: sorry I hit save before I finished

So not only is it special strong, if we define it with the only known things we can define anything with, it breaks all sorts of other things. And since the entire universe isn't bound together into one tight strongly held particle possibly means that the only reason the universe exists at all is because defining the strong force forced particles out of nothing.

[–] sunoc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago

Please do! Us physics enthusiasts laymen need ANSWERS ! :D

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 22 hours ago

fair point, but at least it doesnt break so many symmetries

strong is like the cool hippie brother

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Gravity should be the derpy looking one.

[–] Lucien@mander.xyz 25 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, definitely. Don't know why the literal weakest force in the universe is depicted as some mega dragon.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 17 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

maybe it is because being so weak, it allows things to be come together, and eventually be strong enough, by power of family.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Then it should be Vin Diesel...

[–] muzzle@lemm.ee 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Gravity bends the geometry of spacetime itself, it's pretty eldritch to me.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I explained my reasoning here:

lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/43466460/18473372

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

Gravity at human scales: I sleep

Gravity at stellar scales: Real shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] loaExMachina@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a matter of scale, but gravity is often considered the weakest force. In quantum physics, it's so weak it's often impossible to measure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The weak force is super cool actually

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 22 hours ago

it has its charms

load more comments
view more: next ›