this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes

51431 readers
1315 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Socialists don't hate markets, they hate workers not having any power or democratic choice in how they interact in the market.

Workers owning the means of production just means the workers are doing the same work but they are in ownership of the factory and the profits. They will still sell the products they produce in a marketplace.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I, a socialist, hate markets. They are simplistic and functional artifacts of the available way to pass information.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cool, what is your preferred replacement and does everyone in this thread agree? You have managed to continue criticism but not offer a replacement yet again.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The ole can have criticism without perfect solutions response. Cool, how useless and pointless of you.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm confused, isn't criticism without alternatives itself useless and pointless?

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, it broadens and deepens understanding.

Alternatives come from that understanding. Criticism is the fundamental step towards alternatives.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

No, it broadens and deepens understanding

How exactly do you come to that conclusion?

Edit: "Thing bad" doesn't broaden or deepen anything. "Thing has specific shortcomings which aren't present in specific alternative to thing" is a useful criticism. Criticism without alternatives is just called complaining.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

"thing has specific shortcomings" is a useful criticism.

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

The bias is justified. The left is correct. Markets don't create wealth without necessarily simultaneously creating poverty

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You literally left Reddit because of what capitalism did to it.

[–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I think you will find any place thats well moderated and cracks down on bigotry and hatespeech will skew left.

Weird how that is, huh?

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

middle class between what class and what class? the rich class and the having a great time class?

[–] very_poggers_gay@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Middle class between what

Lmao, this is such a good one

[–] imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Wtf is an uncorrupt government?

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To paraphrase this cool guy named Ernesto: Its not our fault reality is marxist che-si

[–] static_motion@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That guy clearly never heard about the Pareto Principle.

E: fuck yeah, successfully triggered all the hexbear tankies. As fun as poking a wasp nest with a long stick. If only there was an online tankie bug spray equivalent...

[–] MalarchoBidenism@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

If 20% of people own 80% of the land or wealth or whatever in a capitalist country then all that shows is that capitalism produces Pareto distributions. That does not mean Pareto distributions are some universal law of nature nor does it mean that non-capitalist systems are impossible.