this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

504 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I created a tool to host data for individuals on a blockchain. Is this considered "self hosting"?

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moarmagic@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I'm going to say probably not, but depends on your use case.

Putting data on a blockchain is closer to a p2p system. You release it out in the wild and then have little direct control on it. For me, the primary driver of self hosting is taking ownership and control of my data and systems, where here you still primarily rely on other people's systems.

The systems you have Interacting with that data ? Maybe.

[–] techma2019@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Like Filecoin? Or is everyone connecting to your one server…?

[–] ThatDopamine@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Self hosting is a state of mind maaaaaannnnn

[–] 100GHz@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

It's a bit ambiguous question:

A) If you are hosting the blockchain "at home", then by definition you contribute to the consensus of the network and you are just hosting the blockchain. Self hosting becomes irrelevant as your node becomes part of the never ending non reputation party.

B) If you are are enabling people to host data ON the chain itself: Well, good luck on future technical interviews if you put that on your resume :P

[–] bitspace@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NewOCLibraryReddit@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bitspace@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is every node on the blockchain under your control? If so, either you have a huge network or you have a useless blockchain. If not, then it's not self-hosted.

[–] NewOCLibraryReddit@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I am the only one who knows where my data is, and the only one who can decrypt the data, I'll consider that self hosted.

[–] Tripanafenix@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Why bother asking if you know it better?

[–] cdemi@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

So if I host my data on Google Drive and encrypt it and tell no one, that's selfhosting?

[–] Genubath@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think I've you can set up your own local $ETH chain for the purposes of testing out and developing smart contacts. Otherwise, a chain with a single source of concensus (your server) kind of defeats the purpose of using a block chain to begin with