this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
11 points (58.2% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

1 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Finally got round to seeing Guardians 3.... What a waste of 2 1/2 hours that was. I enjoyed the first 2, but 3 was just terrible. The "story" is awful. Numerous, cheesy, cliché bits thrown together here and there. Nothing interesting or very cohesive. Nothing ever had a sense of consequence.

Even the soundtrack couldn't quite save it (though was easily the best part).

"Written and Directed by James Gunn".

Good luck DC, you're gonna need it.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree in that the stakes for 3 are incredibly low. It starts trying to save Rocket's life, but that's nowhere near the same level as playing keep away with an Infinity Stone, or stopping a mad god from destroying the universe.

Rocket dies, or he doesn't, it has an impact on a dozen or so characters.

Then, once Rocket's life is saved, it becomes keeping him away from the High Evolutionary, who wants to use Rockets DNA to fuel a new race of beings just as creative (and destructive?) as Rocket.

But this is, ultimately, Rocket's origin story. The flashbacks are heartbreaking, and, yeah, even though it's smaller in scale, it has more emotion behind it than 1 and 2. It's about the characters and each gets a chance to shine (even Cosmo!)

[–] theinspectorst@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree in that the stakes for 3 are incredibly low. It starts trying to save Rocket’s life, but that’s nowhere near the same level as playing keep away with an Infinity Stone, or stopping a mad god from destroying the universe.

I enjoyed it a lot (probably more than 2 but less than 1), and for me the smaller stakes were one of the reasons why it worked.

Marvel have done the huge stakes already and it's hard to top what they've already done - Thanos eradicating half of the universe. Much of what hasn't quite worked in Phase 4 so far is that they've been trying to do exactly that though - it's no longer about saving the universe, now it's about saving the multiverse, and after a while the stakes get so big as to be meaningless. When you've already done the massive stakes, bringing it back to a smaller scale and more personal stories about beloved characters seems like a smart way of reconnecting with audiences without trying to top the untoppable - at least for a while.

I cared about the stakes in this film far more than I cared about the massive multiversal stakes in Ant-Man 3.

[–] Chaphasilor@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I actually like the stakes to become lower again (we can't keep increasing the stakes forever), I agree that the movie wasn't what I was hoping for. The origin story stuff and cohesion of the group was nice, but the High Evolutionary was really odd overall.

Yeah for real, the High Evolutionary was such a weird choice. Throughout the movie, I kept thinking to myself, "this is the villain?!"

Matteo from Superstore as his top henchman probably didn't help things.

Rocket's origin story was cool, though.

[–] Teal@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I had similar thoughts. It’s worth seeing it once if you’ve seen the others but not as good as the previous two. Some animal scenes were a tough, at least for me. It’s unlikely that I’ll rewatch this one.

[–] akintudne@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Only thing I thought was a painful cliche in the movie was the "no, I won't kill the villain (after mowing down all of his minions like they were nothing) because I'm the good guy!" trope.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I liked it fine (I liked the first two a little better), but I thought the soundtrack was a bit of a mess. Ultimately I thought it was a perfectly adequate way to wrap up the trilogy.

As for having a sense of consequence, you have seen a Marvel movie before, right? It's always cotton candy, even though Rocket's flashback storyline was quite grim.

[–] 1bluepixel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I watched it last month and it's telling that I can't quite remember what it was about. They're trying to save Rocket for a big part of it, and there's a lot of flashbacks to how Rocket came to be. But then that gets resolved and it becomes about... the High Evolutionary, who wants... something? He wants Rocket because he's smart, and he's gonna go do... something? And Adam Warlock is there, except he's a joke character?

I enjoyed it overall, but I have a much clearer recall of the overall dramatic arc of the Christmas Special.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

The High Evolutionary wants Rocket because of all the beings he has created and destroyed, Rocket was the only one capable of independent thought and creativity.

He wants to create a race built on that model, because none of the other civilizations he created ever reached that level.

[–] gwildors_gill_slits@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

It wasn't amazing but IMO the first 2 were also just ok, so I generally enjoyed the 3rd about the same.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The whole MCU has been going downhill since at least Endgame. Too interconnected to follow, too convoluted.