this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
1026 points (97.2% liked)

Progressive Politics

2631 readers
1322 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

state sponsored censorship is bad

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Imagine all the people...

[–] andybytes@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think about the Soviet Union and communism and whatnot. I think your concept of liberal and conservative really set in a modern period. So now it means something totally different than what it used to mean. Liberals are not liberals, and conservatives are not conservatives, in the modern era in America. Like you might not agree with a European conservative, but they're not absolutely horrible, unlike the ultra far right in Europe as well as here in America. Now that might all change due to how much the establishment turns up the volume and the mass hysteria kicks in though. I'm coming from a sociological point of head space, mindset. In regards to America's liberal and conservative i see both as reactionary. America is one of the most propagandized populations in the world. We're like a mixture of North Korea and Disneyland without your wallet. An open-air prison where everybody's gaslighting the fuck out of you. The show must go on, remember to smile. to elaborate further, I think maybe it's always been like this and it just has to do with the bread getting short and the rise of right-wing populism. I think all of this lives on like a spectrum. I just think of Mass hysteria. The Masters know how to fuck with our heads. Like I'm gonna hide underneath my fucking desk to keep myself safe from a nuclear bomb. Fucking ridiculous.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Self-built echo chambers are not something to be proud of; we know those are unhealthy.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Yes, echo chambers are not at all healthy.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to neo-reactionaries, eventually socialists will become the new conservatives. 1Dime talks about this. Crazy stuff.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

TIL

First I am hearing about this narrative.

I see it as some socialists becoming communists over time, or they give in to the status quo, like AOC and Bernie Sanders.

Thanks for the link. I will have to make time to watch it; it looks like a weird and interesting viewpoint!


Generated Summary:

This YouTube video features a discussion between the host of 1Dime Radio and Michael Downs, author of "Capital VS Timenergy: A Žižekian Critique of Nick Land," about accelerationism, focusing on the ideas of Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug), and the challenges of right-wing accelerationism. The conversation also explores "Timeenergy" as a basis for socialism and whether socialism might become a "conservative" movement against the accelerating change of capitalism.

Main Topics:

  • Accelerationism: Exploring the philosophies of Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin, particularly their contributions to accelerationist thought.
  • Neoreaction (NRx): Discussing the core tenets of neoreactionary ideology and its connection to figures like Mencius Moldbug.
  • Capitalism and Artificial Intelligence: Examining Nick Land's thesis that capitalism is inherently geared towards the development of AI.
  • "Timenergy": Introducing and discussing the concept of "Timenergy" (Time + Energy) as a potential foundation for socialist thought.
  • Left vs. Right Accelerationism: Differentiating between left and right-wing approaches to accelerationism.

Key Points:

  • Michael Downs' Background: Downs is presented as a working-class intellectual and autodidact philosopher.
  • Nick Land's Philosophy: Downs provides a detailed breakdown of Nick Land's philosophical evolution, dividing it into six periods:
    1. Early Land: Focus on Denal Materialism, influenced by Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Freud, Bataille, and Deleuze & Guattari.
    2. Mid-90s: Theory-fiction era, emphasizing capitalism as an engine of decoding and deterritorialization, leading to AI production.
    3. CCRU Period: Experimental philosophy collective, exploring the occult and the power of "hypers" (fictions becoming real through hype).
    4. Shanghai Period: Focus on mega-cities as accelerants of AI development.
    5. Neoreactionary Period: Embracing neoreactionary ideas alongside Curtis Yarvin, advocating for "SOV Corps" (Sovereign Corporations) and anti-democracy.
    6. Bitcoin Period: Interest in Bitcoin and its technological potential.
  • Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug): Discussed as a key figure in the neoreactionary movement, advocating for corporate city-states.
  • Critique of Democracy: Both Land and Yarvin are portrayed as being critical of democracy, favoring alternative governance models.
  • AI and the Left: The discussion highlights a perceived lack of engagement with AI on the left, with many leftists dismissing its significance.
  • Marxist Interpretation of AI: Downs argues that Nick Land offers a unique and valuable perspective on AI by analyzing it through a Marxist lens, emphasizing its connection to the structure of the economy.
  • China and Capitalism: The conversation touches on China's success with capitalism, particularly in the field of AI, attributing it to a Marxist understanding of surplus value extraction.

Highlights:

  • The Nick Land vs. Žižek Debate: The video opens with a preview of a discussion about the potential debate between Nick Land and Slavoj Žižek.
  • Downs' Meeting with Žižek: Downs recounts his experience of having breakfast with Slavoj Žižek at a conference.
  • The CCRU's Experimentation: The discussion of the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU) and their exploration of theory-fiction, drugs, and the occult is a notable highlight.
  • Land's Influence on Working-Class Perceptions of AI: Downs shares anecdotes about how his working-class coworkers express views on AI that align with Nick Land's pessimistic predictions.
  • Land's Marxist Perspective: The video emphasizes that Land's unique contribution is his Marxist analysis of AI, linking its development to the structure of the capitalist economy.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›