this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
1454 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

14653 readers
2803 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm imagining a break future where, in order to access data from a website you have to pass a three tiered system of tests that make, 'click here to prove you aren't a robot' and 'select all of the images that have a traffic light' , seem like child's play.

[–] Tiger_Man_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

All you need to protect data from ai is use non-http protocol, at least for now

[–] Bourff@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Easier said than done. I know of IPFS, but how widespread and easy to use is it?

[–] Tiger_Man_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

How can i make something like this

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 144 points 1 day ago (13 children)

It's so sad we're burning coal and oil to generate heat and electricity for dumb shit like this.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

im sad governments dont realize this and regulate it.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (12 children)

Cool, but as with most of the anti-AI tricks its completely trivial to work around. So you might stop them for a week or two, but they'll add like 3 lines of code to detect this and it'll become useless.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Vari@lemm.ee 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m so happy to see that ai poison is a thing

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Don't be too happy. For every such attempt there are countless highly technical papers on how to filter out the poisoning, and they are very effective. As the other commenter said, this is an arms race.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So we should just give up? Surely you don't mean that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 46 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

This is surely trivial to detect. If the number of pages on the site is greater than some insanely high number then just drop all data from that site from the training data.

It's not like I can afford to compete with OpenAI on bandwidth, and they're burning through money with no cares already.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 25 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah sure, but when do you stop gathering regularly constructed data, when your goal is to grab as much as possible?

Markov chains are an amazingly simple way to generate data like this, and a little bit of stacked logic it's going to be indistinguishable from real large data sets.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine the staff meeting:

You: we didn't gather any data because it was poisoned

Corposhill: we collected 120TB only from harry-potter-fantasy-club.il !!

Boss: hmm who am I going to keep...

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The boss fires both, "replaces" them for AI, and tries to sell the corposhill's dataset to companies that make AIs that write generic fantasy novels

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 404 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Funny that they’re calling them AI haters when they’re specifically poisoning AI that ignores the do not enter sign. FAFO.

[–] Clanket@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

Fair As Fuck Ok?

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 43 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

First Albatross, First Out

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 16 points 18 hours ago

Fluffy Animal's Fecal Orifice.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 194 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Deployment of Nepenthes and also Anubis (both described as "the nuclear option") are not hate. It's self-defense against pure selfish evil, projects are being sucked dry and some like ScummVM could only freakin' survive thanks to these tools.

Those AI companies and data scrapers/broker companies shall perish, and whoever wrote this headline at arstechnica shall step on Lego each morning for the next 6 months.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 49 points 1 day ago

Feels good to be on an instance with Anubis

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] passepartout@feddit.org 255 points 1 day ago

AI is the "most aggressive" example of "technologies that are not done 'for us' but 'to us.'"

Well said.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Markov Babble" would make a great band name

[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 15 points 21 hours ago

Their best album was Infinite Maze.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 47 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Could you imagine a world where word of mouth became the norm again? Your friends would tell you about websites, and those sites would never show on search results because crawlers get stuck.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That would be terrible, I have friends but they mostly send uninteresting stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›