I think its better not to repeat answers in different parts. If many reviewers ask for the same thing it's better to make a general response addressing that and then refer that in response to both reviewers with a brief summary in the current response.
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Machine Learning
1 readers
1 users here now
Community Rules:
- Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
- Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
- Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
- Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
Make life as easy as possible for your reviewers. I would just copy paste the answer.
This but with a note that a similar answer was given to a comment from another reviewer. Some people might dislike a copy paste without a warning
In this case, I recommend uploading comments as a general response to answer same questions. Use the "Official Comment" button.
Do as you prefer, yet don't expect too much reviewers to change their minds. In my experience it works better to write the rebuttal as something directed to the AC, extra points if you can have an AC reaction.
How does one write towards the AC?
Highlight misunderstanding and contradictions of the review. Keep it short if you have strong parts in your answers. Answering all the small details often leads to exchange of messages so long that the AC will skip them and directly read the paper.