Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] How are Statistics Journals Viewed in Machine Learning Community for Research Jobs? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by herodotick@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi all, I'm a statistics PhD researching statistical machine learning (think Gaussian Processes). I have a few papers in the pipeline at solid statistics publications (Journal of the American Statistical Association/Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics).

Do these journals have any weight/name recognition in the ML world or are they unknown/chopped liver? Thanks!

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] NOTWorthless@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think there are plenty of Statisticians working in ML who obviously know JASA and JCGS, and you do see pretty well-known folks from the Mike Jordan tree who often publish in JASA. But the broader community, probably not so much. There are tons of fields that publish in the ML venues, and just like I might not understand how good a journal Operations Research or IEEE Information Theory are, they won’t know JASA.

[–] stargazer_w@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Do I have to pay for it? If yes - then no thank you. We have more than enough sources to get informed about papers from. I can't wait till other sciences catch up to the openness in science that we have in AI and IT in general.