this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

7011 readers
49 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mirror

Analysis by Scott Manley

https://youtu.be/0C_L-qgHsE0

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 70 points 1 week ago

Woah! We should DEFUND MY CHILDS EDUCATION and give THIS Company BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of Dollars instead!

[–] Lawnman23@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So how much carbon emissions did this release?

[–] thegr8goldfish@startrek.website 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not much more than if the test was successful. The fuel would have burned either way.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess if the rocket hadn't disassembled itself, then it could be used again.
I think static fire is part of the testing to proceed to a launch? So, now they have to build another and static fire that as well in order to get back to where they should be.

[–] AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago

And presumably a launch pad

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Much less than if it had actually launched. It burns on the ground, when it blows up in the sky its just pollution. Not to mention all the "venting" that happens during engine relights and coast periods which just means dumping methane and oxygen.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's not necessarily true, rockets Cary there own oxygen, pure Oxygen can burn hot enough and oxidize enough to burn nontraditional things like steel and concrete, it would also vaporize toxic heavy metals and exotic foreign materials from the rocket itself.

[–] forgetful_fox@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Literally what spaceX said years ago

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope that put a small dent in the Nazi's finances.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I believe SpaceX is funded by taxes.

Upon further research SpaceX is funded by mixed sources, personal, private and government.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The ship can burn while standing still so I guess it passed the test. Great success!

Get in the starship, Elon!

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Reason number 75 people should always be well clear of these tests. When you build a rocket, you are essentially building a guided bomb that you are crossing your fingers doesn't explode outside the chamber.

Russia lost a good chunk of their rocket scientists in the early 1900s when a blast from one of these took put everything within like a mile radius.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Reason number 75 people should always be well clear of these test.

Yup, except for the really important guage that is installed on the pad, that only Elon musk is smart enough to be able to understand.
He absolutely has to monitor that guage in realtime.

[–] thepenismightier@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you can't calculate a blast radius accurately, how good of a scientist are you really?

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I mean, we were cowboying this stuff back in the day. The science was not very exact, so its hard to know what the blast radius is. I will say, you only make that mistake once.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

couldn't have happened to a nicer nazi.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

🎶 AND THE STARSHIP’S RED GLARE… 🎵

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Why does this video repeat the same shit twice? Just let it play past the end and (my client at least) just starts replaying it anyways, so what's the point in sticking a repetition into the file itself? I hope the compression at least results in it not using much more space for the 2nd copy.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Boy howdy, his rockets sure do blow up a lot, don't they?

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'll tell you what's wrong with it. It ain't got no gas in it

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

In it?

I knew I did something wrong...

[–] Zagam@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago

That looks just like Elon's political career.

[–] dumbass@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Elons ketamine fueled reply to being sued over xai's emissions polluting the air.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

All I can say is. BEAUTIFUL!

[–] 50MYT@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Another one they filled too fast?

[–] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

This the new SpaceX-PLODE model?

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Looks like the front fell off.