Important distinction: it was cited 29 times [by non-parties to the case who filed amicus briefs carrying no legal weight].
It was not cited 29 times in the actual ruling.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Important distinction: it was cited 29 times [by non-parties to the case who filed amicus briefs carrying no legal weight].
It was not cited 29 times in the actual ruling.
Good point. But the fact there were 29 trans-dubious quotes for those amicus briefs to pull does tell us about the NYT's coverage bias.
NYT as a whole hasn't really been neutral or "dedicated to journalistic objectivity" for a long time now.
Famous are their countless pieces blaming democrats for losing elections because they're not republican enough.
They bear a fair share of the blame for how the USA got to where it is today.
Holy fucking shit tinyurl 😂