this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
641 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 52 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Bluesky is technically decentralized, since it’s built on top of the AT Protocol, but users who sign up for Bluesky (which is still invite-only) still must sign up via the company’s main bsky.social network.

so... not decentralized as of now?

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 12 points 11 months ago

BSky is the media's favourite, so of course they're doing the PR campaign.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

it's just a lie by a corperation. don't trust it

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

@throws_lemy @noodlejetski The registry still is centralized, but the users already are distributed across multiple servers that talk to each other using that protocol.

[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

Interesting. I don't fully understand the mechanics behind it but it certainly sounds a bit different then the usual

[–] notepass@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That just sounds like standard scaling. No big Plattform is running on one server with one instance

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@notepass No. In difference to regular scaling you can see the host of your account. These are separate systems that communicate via Bluesky's protocol and not via the regular scaling mechanisms.

[–] loki@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

can users in other instances talk with people in bluesky?

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 1 points 11 months ago

@throws_lemy @noodlejetski Some more background concerning the decentralization:
github.com/bluesky-social/atpr…

[–] CubbyTustard@reddthat.com 35 points 11 months ago

I dunno I tried this Bluesky thing and nobody would talk to me. Place smelled good though. Pic related BlueSky

[–] ShrimpsIsBugs@feddit.de 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wait, I thought the decentralized version of Twitter was Mastodon

[–] nx2@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

It is. BlueSky or for short BS (ha!) just took the open standard and closed it again!

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The article isn’t quite clear on if this is a Twitter subsidiary, or actual competition.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yea that's a bad title

Offshoot

Was it initially a spin off or something?

[–] aperson@beehaw.org 15 points 11 months ago

Jack Dorsey, formerly head of Twitter, sits on the board for blue sky, which is not related to Twitter.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

It was originally a Twitter project, but it clearly didn't get included in the sale. It was Jack's "offload the cost of hosting social media to others, while retaining all of the revenue generating abilities for the company" Hail Mary.

Then the big doofus came along and threw so much money at him.

[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

It also gets "decentralisation" wrong.

[–] sculd@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Seriously why is Bluesky not open for everyone? Do they have issues with scaling?

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 2 points 11 months ago

@sculd @throws_lemy They are a really small company. So their resources are limited. For example until they started the internal decentralization, they had got a single Postgres database for everything.

[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 months ago

I keep reading about bluesky on here, and here on bluesky. But calling it decentralised is wrong.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 11 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryBluesky, a decentralized social media app alternative to X (formerly Twitter), has announced that it has now crossed 2 million users — doing so just two months after crossing 1 million users.

The company is also finally about to add a public web interface, which might help make it a more attractive destination for journalists and other users.

One big hurdle for Bluesky to reach a bigger audience is that people can’t view links to posts without being signed in, so the upcoming public web interface should finally help alleviate that problem.

The public interface is slated for launch “around the end of this month,” according to the company’s blog post.

A federated network would allow users to post through various providers instead of a large central platform like most big social media companies.

Right now, Mastodon is the most prominent decentralized Twitter-like platform that already openly supports multiple providers and has attracted a lot of journalists and professionals.


Saved 31% of original text.