this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
155 points (98.7% liked)

Games

20044 readers
984 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

From the article:

Danilov posited that the mistake was either the work of a "careless translator taking shortcuts", or it was "done by someone on the dev/publisher side who couldn't be arsed sending last-minute missing lines for translation and decided to throw them in a random LLM without oversight".

Handong Ryu, who handled the Korean translation for the game, replied: "I was responsible for translating the vast majority of the Korean version of The Alters. Unfortunately, the same issue exists in the Korean version as well, which makes it more likely that the second scenario you mentioned is closer to the truth.

Sounds like this text was either added late in development or simply overlooked until after the last set of translation work had been completed, so the devs decided to let an LLM do it rather than getting billed for another batch of localisation.

Very dumb, especially as this puts them in direct violation of the Steam AI disclosure policy, but given the context I guess they figured no one would notice.

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They could have used Google translate for these short last minute additions, and not a single fuck would probably notice. I hate this stupid overconfidence in AI.

[–] duchess@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Google Translate also uses an AI model.

[–] FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

When people are talking about dissatisfaction with AI usage, in this context they specifically mean LLMs and GenAI. Google translate may use LLMs as part of their translation model, but it doesn't make up the whole pipeline and will work completely differently than copy pasting some text into an LLM and telling it to translate something.

[–] FatCrab@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

It probably uses a GPT of some sort at this point, tbh. There is no reason whatsoever using Google's ML translation or ChatGPT's ML translation should make any bit of difference to people who are actually upset over this if they have given any thought whatsoever to their concerns.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have done translations and even for my own language I often use an LLM. It's the one thing they are actually amazing at. It's also probably not about "anybody noticing". It can very much be a single developer doing it on their own ChatGPT account and the QA didn't notice it.

I really don't care about this stuff though. The AI label should be for gen AI and not revising some text or translation imo.

[–] Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 days ago

The issue becomes: if they used Gen AI to create background filler text, can we be 100% certain it wasn’t used elsewhere in the production of the game?

If they really wanted background text, they should have paid someone to write some, or use Lorem Ipsum if they didn’t want to spend the money and no one would have cared.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lath@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (46 children)

"like it or not, gen AI is becoming an invaluable tool for developers"..

..who wish to take a dump on their work.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I love seeing these outside views from folks who aren't developers 🤣

Gen AI is pretty well integrated into development pipelines at this point. In ways that are subtle and quite useful.

Especially autocomplete as you write code, and boiler plate autofill. These used genai, are subtle and not necessarily intrusive, and are pretty widely integrated across the development ecosystem.

Like everything the poison makes the dose. The larger the dose of genai the more poison you are introducing into your work.

[–] duchess@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It will be used as a tool in pre-production and early stages of asset creation and no one will notice afterwards.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (9 children)

You're expecting it to be used responsibly when we ourselves in general are very lacking in that department.

This here is a very good example of the actual use that will happen. A rush job to meet unrealistic deadlines. And that's what will happen as is the norm.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's already in use responsibly.

And irresponsibly.

Turns out that you can't really argue the slope of responsibility as a way to shoot down a tool, when that's an individual choice of how someone uses that tool.

[–] pory@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The translation flub is the only part that mattered here. The Alters was getting a ton of praise and good press for its story, characters, mocap, VA, mechanics, visuals, you name it. Finding out that someone used GPT for some glorified lorem ipsum to paste on a random background object doesn't change the quality one iota. The art team for this game was paid and hired and they did a phenomenal job with the game, but one of those paid artists took a shortcut for some assets. It's not a "the ayy eye is letting corpo CEOs skip out on paying real human artists!!!" situation here.

Do you know what else paid artists / game studios do other than pay a human to create an asset from scratch? They buy models and textures on the Unreal/etc asset store. The same exact boulder model is present in everything from ffviiR to Clair Obscur to Death Stranding, because it comes free with the engine and is "good enough" just like an AI generated rock texture would be.

Ever hire a professional photo editor? They're using generative AI. Every last one of them. They've been doing it for like 15 years ever since Adobe introduced "content-aware fill" algorithms that generate backgrounds to replace random bystanders or objects in a shot. Is the scary robot stealing someone's job and burning the planet there too?

However, using machine translation without even a proofreading pass is hilarious. Using a conversational model for translation is double hilarious. Surely purpose-built translation tools exist and are more efficient than "asking" chatGPT to "translate this line into Brazilian Portuguese".

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 18 points 2 days ago

"You're not actually supposed to read that text so this is not an issue." Good job missing the point.

[–] net00@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago

That's kinda sloppy, mainly in the disclosure and translation department, but nothing that some updates won't solve.

I'm happy to support these devs with original ideas, even while they use some AI in a non-intrusive way. They have done something more important for in my book, which is following regional pricing.

It's stupid how several studios think charging my 3rd world country the same or even more than the US is a good idea. CDPR and bethesda think it's ok, but It's disgusting. I would rather support 11bit.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Very soon protesting the use of LLMs is like going to be like protesting the advent of the television. There is no stopping it. We should endeavour to ensure it is used ethically rather than becoming puritanical about its use.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, fuck that, fuck genAI it is unethical by virtue of stealing to train and vastly draining resources to power slop garbage.

Television was a medium, communication. GenAI is not communicating shit, it's trash sold on a lie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It will take a fundamentally different algorithmic approach to make further progress in ML.

We have never figured out a different approach since it's inception in the 60s

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

There's still plenty of people who don't watch TV.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Damn, I was looking forward to playing this. Glad I read this first

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›