this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
807 points (95.4% liked)

politics

24552 readers
2678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

She should definitely run but also let the people choose from a valid primary.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

During a debate, AOC would smash any Government of Putin candidate. The problem lies with the Democratic Party.

Kamala showed trump for the idiot he is. Didn't make much of a difference. I think AOC would do much better, but I don't hold out much expectations for debates to influence things. Hell, the current criminal in the white house didn't participate in the Republican primary debates and still, somehow, got a bunch of inbred hillbillies to vote for him.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And the deep-seated sexism of too many independent/moderate voters, unfortunately.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 day ago

"After Zohran Mamdani's win, Trump reveals how scared he is to face Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez"

Yeah, because she would be running against Trump... That's a really silly take.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People in america still believe there is going to be an actual election in 2028?

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah it's weird, and if there are elections popular opposition candidates will face a fate like mr Navalny, I'm afraid. Much as I would like AOC as a US president, I think at this point, she needs to run for her life rather than for president. And believe me, I truly hate that this is the case.

She is an amazing person and a fantastic leader. However she is the kind of person the fascists fear and she is also the right shade of skin to earn a one way ticket to El Salvador.

You see the people clamoring for the deportation of mr Mamdani, and he is at this point nothing more than one party's possible candidate for mayor of one town. Imagine what would happen if ms Ocasio-Cortez were an actual presidential candidate!?

Even now I worry about her safety often. Same for that wonderful ms Crockett, mr Frost and a few others.

I have my doubts

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We just going to post this in every thread from now on?

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Yes. Until americans realise it. They are still making stupid little jokes about the regine in talk shows, they are staying or talking about midterms or 2028. Absolutely naive.

They need to fucking leave the country. If they cant afford to leave sell what you have, save until you can leave but leave.

Or if you want to fight dont do cute peaceful no kings protests for a few days. Shut down the country, general strike. Use the amendment you always claim is there to prevent the situation you have now.

Dont joke and laugh about jokes in SNL but wake up and either save your life and that of your family by leaving or fight.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (37 children)

NGL I'll take any blue tie but we've already shown twice that Americans might actually prefer fascism over a woman in charge.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

While those are two possible points of data, there are a number of other factors that contributed to each Democratic candidates' loss vs. Trump.

  • Both suffered from being establishment candidates in an antiestablishment era.
  • Both were only really willing to push to milquetoast progressive policies.
  • Both followed disappointing democratic presidents that promised a lot and delivered little, often due to their own party sabotaging attempts at major progressive reform.

I truly think that Democrat voters want real, progressive change (even if they find words like "socialism" scary) but most Democrat politicians aren't willing to anger their wealthy Third Way/Neoliberal/Abundance/whatever-the-fuck-they-want-to-call-themselves donors.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] terminhell@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't the Dems run on 'anyone but Sanders' and they propped up Clinton instead?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

HELL YEAH THIS COUNTRY NEEDS AOC

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My right-wing friend finds AOC hot so he might actually vote for her if she runs.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right wingers love the idea of hate-sex

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Right-wingers tried to make fun of her, and lost.

[–] jhoff90@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the BIG Bill of Garbage passes, there are no more free elections.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Just passed the Senate by one vote. Back to the House for the finale vote, which is controlled by Republicans.

It's over fam.

You can kiss this nation goodbye.

Now hunker down for the suffering and death that's sure to follow.

This is what happens when you give conservatives power. Such a profoundly stupid nation of individuals.

[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Save us aoc your our only hope

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

"Why AOC should've run for president in 2024"

[–] intheformbelow@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (11 children)

God, americans are so naive. There won't be fair elections anymore. You had your chance and you blew it! It's over for your democracy.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No way AOC is getting anywhere near the Presidency unless there is a full scale revolution. Sad, but true.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She should run for the senate seat when chuck leaves office after he finally comes to his senses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Salamence@lemmy.zip 52 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The democrat leadership did everything in their power to stop bernie in 2020 they will do the same against AOC

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Zohran Mamdani is just the democratic primary if I understand correctly. He's not the mayor of New York yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›