this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

LocalLLaMA

1 readers
1 users here now

Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

https://openai.com/blog/openai-announces-leadership-transition

tldr: Sama stepped down, Chief technology officer Mira Murati appointed interim CEO to lead OpenAI

What do we make of it?

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stannenb@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

tldr: Sama stepped down,

No, he was fired.

Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities. The board no longer has confidence in his ability to continue leading OpenAI.

That's as close to "he lied to us so we fired his ass" as you're ever going to hear from a corporate board.

[–] revenant-miami@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

He is the one who pushed for the crippling censoring “alignment”

[–] random_bloke_hunting@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

not even an hour , and mira's wiki page is already updated. this is wild

[–] orangeatom@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I think this is overall negative, i get the sense that there is a glass ceiling....

[–] yahma@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like he LIED to the board and the kicked him off. What did he lie about? Did they crack AGI, or is the board upset that Altman appears to be pro-regulation?

[–] Monkey_1505@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

My guess is some kind of exploit, feature or flaw that he knew about with potential PR impacts, that he didn't tell them. Something akin to knowing Bing would go Sydney.

[–] ttkciar@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Sounds like he LIED to the board and the kicked him off.

That's my take, too.

It seems he told them things that sounded really good, but weren't actually true.

A bit like LLM inference, that.

[–] 4hometnumberonefan@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Probably not a good sign. Investors probably want someone who is more conventional and mainstream, to drive more profit.

[–] PMMeYourWorstThought@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They going to make it open again? They forgot their mission.,

[–] AwayConsideration855@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They will open the capped profit.

[–] superbottom85@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

We’ll see about this.

[–] Utoko@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

No the opposite, only Ilya Sutskever is left from the founders on the board since Greg Brockman quit too. It will be more closed up and profit oriented to keep AI "safe".

[–] nhbis0n@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Did the AI coordinate his sacking?

[–] Postorganic666@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Looks like a more pro-government guy is taking the seat. More restrictions, more surveillance, censorship, more misuse of personal data, manipulation and propaganda. Hopefully alternatives to gpt 4 will see the light of day soon

[–] Papalui@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

good news, if openai really opens up

[–] Utoko@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

What gives you that expression, looks like completely the opposite. Now only Ilya left on the board, Greg Brockman quit too. It looks more and more like a normal corporate board.

[–] superbottom85@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Probably the opposite will happen.

[–] MeMyself_And_Whateva@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

The founder is thrown out of the company when new investors gain control. That's life.

[–] thereisonlythedance@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

This will be about AI safety.

[–] herozorro@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

The irony now is that Grok will have the latest info on this as people are tweeting about it

[–] Ilforte@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Look at the board members. It's Open Philanthropy/Effective Altruism coup to prevent AI progress, not these mundane concerns like accounting.

[–] Only-Letterhead-3411@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

RIP OpenAI.

[–] Maykey@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I hope openai becomes more open under new leadership, but I am not holding my breath

[–] MannowLawn@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Maybe they will be a bit more reasonable with their content filtering, some the shit you see now is ridiculous.

The competition for running locally is catching up to gpt. I’m happy to pay for everything but openai is so restricted these days, you’re better off with running something locally.