this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
749 points (99.2% liked)

People Twitter

7670 readers
1099 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Surprisingly Kevin Nash is a wrestler i don’t like as a person but he seems to have his head on straight about politics. Meanwhile the undertaker is a trump stooge, stone cold Steve Austin is a wife beating racist and Triple h is a supporter of the moron family he married into. Most of the wrestlers i grew up liking are conservative idiots, Chris Jericho is a Canadian trump supporter

[–] miseducator@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lots of getting hit in the head with folding chairs will turn ya conservative.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somehow Mick Foley took the most chair shots but is one of the smartest and is anti trump

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

He is just the GOAT

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I mean, look what happened to Fetterman after his stroke….

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

vince mchmon a contributor to the campaign, also his wife linda mcohman has been in trumps administration 2 times already. it make sense now since ufc and wwe have very similar audience, most are trump supporters.

[–] Bms@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats a shame about jericho. Had no idea.

Not only that but he’s a creep against women too. There were talks of sexual abuse and NDAs being signed and payoffs made to keep women quiet. His wife was at the capitol during the January 6th insurrection. He’s a disgrace to Canada

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I came up with a rhyme for the occasion: "Happy 4th of july! If you are poor you will die!"

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your poem is very appropriate - you might want to break that down into two lines, give it a title, post it on c/poetry@lemmy.world, and don't forget to add the [OC] tag.

Let's just see how it does there. You can count on my up-vote.

But don't feel obligated - strictly if you felt like doing this. Have a good day.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

This reads like a promo-bot comment.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 17 points 1 week ago

Make America the Great depression Again.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Independence Day doesn’t matter to you unless you have at least one billion dollars in your bank account.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

Just like the OG Independence Day.

[–] konki@lemmy.one 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just want to point out that the debt itself is not an issue. The problem with this bill is its cuts in welfare and horrible distributional consequences, but the increased deficit and debt are not.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] konki@lemmy.one 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It could, but it isn't. The US national debt is solely denominated in US dollars: A currency of which the US government is the monopoly issuer. Thus the US government cannot run out of money to pay its obligations.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except that leads to inflation, which is a huge deal.

[–] konki@lemmy.one 1 points 1 week ago

No, it doesn't. What could lead to inflation is government bidding up prices by spending in areas where the resources are already fully employed. That can happen whether the government runs a deficit or a surplus. If the government spends on something where there is idle productive capacity, the spending is not necessarily inflationary, as the increased demand is easily met by an increased supply. If, on the other hand, the government spends on something where the production is already at full employment, they will be engaged in a bidding war against the private sector (a bidding war the government will always be able to win) which will drive prices up. My point is that both these scenarios are independent of whether or not the governemnt runs a deficit. It is simply a question of real resources.

OP is always posting weirdos who pretend to be democrats in republican owned spaces, it must be his poopy pass-time

load more comments
view more: next ›