this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
22 points (80.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35312 readers
1482 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Again, excuse my ignorance, I'm just curious since I don't really know the context and everything else I found has confused me. So I'm hoping someone might be able to explain it and give me much better context.

Article: https://www.axios.com/2023/11/16/elon-musk-antisemitic-claim-tesla-shares

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 26 points 10 months ago

This piece from The Atlantic goes into the detail of it.

It's an incredibly dangerous lie to be spreading but the tweet wouldn't make sense unless you knew the broader context (the Great Replacement conspiracy theory), which Musk clearly does or he wouldn't have gone out of his way to reply. He has tried to row back on it since but just made his take on this more blatant.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's saying that antisemitism isn't real but only in the imagination of jewish people, while it's supposed to be a fact that Jews systemiletical work on the eradication of white people, while also implying that jewish people aren't white, so boosting the Nazi argument of some white master race based on genetics.

It's also implying that jews aren't individuals but are all conspiring together.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I won't quote them or link shitter but for those out of the loop, here is the Guardian article on the matter.

[–] chrischryse@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

lol thanks just updated my post todays one of those days

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

A tweet posted by @breakingbaht on Wednesday night read: “Jewish communties have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.”

With this you can (start to) decide by yourself.

The second part of the post is not easy to understand for me. it's this :
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/34abea74-9f86-4437-9f93-fb7bb64c65a4.jpeg

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it’s like the second paragraph was written by a different person. Maybe he was high.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So... honest question here. The original tweeter.

Does anybody wanna take a stab at what the heck 'Dialectical Hatred' even... means?
I mean, hatred, yeah. that's obvious.
Dialectical... though is usually a method of discourse that's similar to debating- that is, two opposing view points hashing it out. (it differs some from debating, particularly in the arguments that are considered appropriate- for example, debate allows emotional arguments where dialectics doesn't)

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can't find any evidence of that being a term prior to the tweet. I'd guess one of

  • they meant something simple like 'hateful dialogue' or 'hateful diatribe', and thought it was a smart person way of saying it.
  • it's the dog whistle du jour. Somewhere on stormfront or voat they're getting terribly worked up about 'dialectical hatred' as the new current threat to the white race.
  • it's used in some niche context where it has meaning. But our tweeter thinks it's got more reach than it actually does.
[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] kaiomai@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yes, as a right-wing cesspool.

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Dunno. They're probably all on X these days.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

He tweets a lot of things. Gonna have to link to the specific one you are curious about.