Now EACL hompage is updated. Discussion period is 23-28 Nov.
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Machine Learning
1 readers
1 users here now
Community Rules:
- Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
- Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
- Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
- Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
:((
It is strange that they havent sent even 1 notification to authors' mail boxes.
so when will reviews get released?
According to EACL 2024 website, I think the reviews will be available on 23 Nov (aoe).
so when will reviews get released?
reviews are out. Does anyone know if we are allowed to make modifications to the paper or we are only allowed to answer directly to the feedbacks?
I cannot access to openreview right now, openreview appears to go down
333, seems right on the borderline. Is the soundness score affect the final decision?
Are these scores based on the Soundness criteria or Overall Assessment from each reviewer?
What scores are more important? Overall Assessment or Soundness?
Soundness. Overall Assessment seems to be an alternate name for Excitement (https://2023.aclweb.org/blog/review-form/ and https://aclrollingreview.org/reviewform)
Thanks for replying. Do you think it is possible to get into the main conference with 3,4,3 for soundness?
Pretty good chance but usually depends on the specific track
2.5 2 and 2, seems pretty bad, should i just withdraw it?
Maybe we should revise and submit to naacl instead
Why do you think the chances in naacl will be higher?
We see the comments and using those comments to submit naacl. Our baselines are for text. What else conferences we could submit? If we submit to other ml conf, they always ask why u dont do this algorithm on computer vision datasets? Pls tell me your idea if u have other confs to submit. My algorithm is a novelty one with outstanding experimental results. Reviewers also recognized that in the strength acknowledgement but they didnt give me high scores as my writing is not detailed enough. I also feel stressed with those kinds of comments.
What are the benefits of withdrawing?
To make it possible to submit to another conference before results are out
2.5,2.5,2. Should i do the rebuttal phase?
First submission of mine. I received ratings of 3.5, 3.5, and 3.5. Is it possible to pass the findings or main conf?
Are these scores based on Overall or Soundness?
overall, my soundness is 3.5/4/3.5
Can someone say, what are you watching: soundness or overall assessment?
Soundness: 3/4/3 Overall assessment: 3.5/3.5/2.5
Is it possible to pass for main or findings?
Good soundness and fine overall.
It seems 2.5 rather than 3 is the borderline. In this way, 3 is a positive score. Did I understand correctly?
I think 3.0 is the boarderline and plus and/or minus 0.5 is a weak leaning.
Huge chance of Findings (Fig 5a: https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.report.pdf). The average soundness score is 3.3, and the average overall score is 3.17.
To me, the overall score seems similar to the excitement score (by its definition). Both overall and excitement score tends to be lower than the soundness score, and are more subjective.
Soundness: 4.5/3/3.5 and Overall: 4/2.5/3
Similar questions with others; which score is more important now?
Very good points in my opinion. Likely for Main and Findings.
My paper
- Soundness: 2.5/4/3
- Overall: 2/3/3
Paper I reviewed
- Soundness: 3/3/2.5
- Overall: 2/2.5/2.5
- I gave 2.5/2.5 for soundness and overall.
Another Paper I reviewed
- Soundness: 3/3/3.5
- Overall: 2/2.5/3
- I gave 3.5/3 for soundness and overall.
My paper: Soundness: 3.5/2/3.5/3 Overall: 3.5/2/3.5/2.5
It’s always reviewer no. 2 😔 what are my chances? Reviewer 1,3,4 gave good reviews and asked only small clarification questions which can be easily addressed
3.5/2/3.5/2.5
Is there an importance to the order of reviews a paper gets?
Does anyone know the maximal word count of the author response? Is the count the total number of words for all reviewer together or for each single reviewer? Thank you!
One reviewer suddenly lowered the score from 3 to 2 without fair justification. I wrote a confidential message to editors, but I want to more strongly appeal the capricious reviewer since it can contaminate whole ARR review system. Who should I contact? Do I have to maintain my anonymity when I sens a mail to editors-in-chief?
I've got 3.5/4/3 for soundness and 3/2.5/2.5 for overall. Do I have chances for findings? Or to withdraw and submit to other venues?
Good soundness score and not bad overall. It should have a chance for Finding maybe.
When a paper is submitted for the Main conference (long paper), it can be accepted to the Findings session?
i guess it is, the paper is considered as : main, findings or reject.
It got some shots to Findings (Figure 5a at https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.report.pdf). To me, the overall score seems similar to the excitement score (by its definition). Both overall and excitement score tends to be lower than the soundness score, and are more subjective.
Your average soundness score is 3.5 (high, i.e., in the range of the main and findings paper), and the averaged overall score is 2.7 (a bit lower than the average of the findings paper)
My Paper:
Soundness 4/4/2.5, overall 3/3/2. Does it stand a chance in any track ?
Likely, it is a very good score for findings in my opinion.
Now changed scores are: Soundness 4/4/3, overall 3/3/3. Does it stand a chance in any track now?
I received an email that says the deadline for review updates to November 30th AOE.
Anyone knows if the correction of scores will be reviewed during the feedback session? Thinking of withdrawing instead of waiting
So, when will the meta review be released?
Why I got four reviews? Sound/Overall: 3/2.5, 4/4, 4/3.5, 3.5/4. Is it possible to main conf?
Feels like best paper ;)