this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
135 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

6835 readers
350 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The slop in search will continue until you give up on Google.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Somewhat ironic given that DuckDuckGo has AI on by default. You have to either save the settings on the cloud or manually turn off AI when searching using DuckDuckGo. Still a good privacy search engine though.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b12b60ef-816c-4fef-9124-9c33041c9587.jpeg

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wait, it has a quick blurb on by default but actually interacting with it requires an opt in. That seems like a good balance.

In fact doing a search now (duck is my default) it doesn't even offer an ai answer unless I click it first.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't call it private as from my experience it uses browser fingerprinting to target users.

[–] sexybenfranklin@ttrpg.network 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Ironically, I left DuckDuckGo and switched to Kagi when DDG announced their AI.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't Kagi use AI as well now though?

[–] other_cat@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago

Yep, the Kagi Assistant. I think you can turn it off but like DDG it's on by default.

[–] reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago

Performative.

[–] QualifiedKitten@discuss.online 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But what about all the AI slop in the web results?

[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It does also have the option to filter AI generated images from search results.

[–] QualifiedKitten@discuss.online 3 points 10 months ago

I don't actually do all that many image searches. I'm usually searching for text based pages, and those results have also gotten super terrible, but this doesn't seem to have any impact on that.

[–] ThrowAwayAccountNo4@piefed.ca 10 points 10 months ago

No idea if it's how I have things saved but DDG is just enough AI for me. If I want AI to answer a stupid question without making me bother with shitty SEO spam, great! If I want to find a site, I can! Not costing me anything near as I can tell.

I'm happy enough with DDG. Your use-case will vary.

[–] Turd_Ferg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

Their AI is only useful because the quality of search results has gotten so bad.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Let's mitigate AI hate by putting in more AI!"

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

The AI is actually fairly useful and can be disabled.

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It used to be when you searched for something, it was information first, products second. If you searched bicycle, it would give you the Wikipedia page for bicycle, and then pages related to bicycles, some of which would be retailers. Now it's the other way around, if the informational pages even show up at all.

Forget all the AI bullshit, this is my biggest gripe with search engines today. This is why people use ChatGPT - for all its faults - to search shit that Google used to answer. ChatGPT will confidently lie to you, but it least it gives you an answer instead of trying to sell something to you.

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

I have to add "Wikipedia" or "stack overflow" or "reddit" to most searches