Have you used this? Is there any benefits over bash-completion?
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
48069 readers
772 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I've not used it yet, but I found bash-completion to be lacking quite often. Completion is one reason I'm using fish atm.
But from the looks of it it's exactly what bash/zsh is missing for me.
Have you tried ZShell? I'm consistently amazed at the number of great plugins that get made for it.
I've used zsh for it's support for posix sh and have my config. But I find fish to be faster with the features I want and it has those features ootb.
Maybe I'll give zsh another try.