Data Hoarder

1 readers

1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

Partitioning scheme to protect long term internal parts? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by Key_Mammoth7084@alien.top to c/datahoarder@selfhosted.forum

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm not sure this has been ever discussed here.

On a 18tb drive, is there any benefit if i create first partition = 1tb, second 16tb, and last 1tb in order to protect the head from being forced into extremities of the disk? I'm planning to use only the middle one.

I don't remember where i've read something similar about old models, they had failures because of the head skipping over the surface. I know at least when the hdd is full, the head struggles with speed.

Maybe these new multiple platter/head drives write data differently, so my partitioning method wouldn't matter if first partition is written on the first platter and not vertically on the first blocks of all the platters....

Someone more into technical stuff please explain what's best. Thanks!

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Carnildo@alien.top 2 points 11 months ago

Assuming your 18TB drive was manufactured sometime in the past thirty years or so, there's no need. Manually managing the internals of a hard drive pretty much went out of style in the late 1980s.