this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
519 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/5184#issuecomment-1829172308

Twitch is a dangerous website, the extension probably won't be back. They could still easily target you at any time and you are just lucky they are sending ads. After some time of using the extension twitch will react and become even more toxic.

Twitch even has a network sniffer in its source code (among other things), its so much worse than just ads, some of these experiments are basically malware/pup that no-one would install on their device willingly, these instances aren't just left over code from some library they are deliberately crafted experiments that are present in the active code path.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MoogleMaestro@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

Until there's evidence there's basically no reason to treat this as news.

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

MostlyJustBored's account is 3 weeks old with no history. We should take whatever they say with a grain of salt.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Or we could take a look at the javascript ourselves, like they say to do?

Everyone's asking for a writeup, but like... there's not any other JS programmers who could take a look and verify?

Nobody wants to trust this guy, but also nobody wants to do the legwork to verify it.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most JS shipping on the web is minified, with variables renamed to random names, you can't just open it and search for maliciousFunction.

Also their claim of Twitch doing network sniffing in a browser should be impossible unless Twitch has found and is actively exploiting a security flaw in modern web browsers.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 5 points 9 months ago

Technically, twitch could sniff all the traffic exchanged with their user. It would be pointless as they already know the content of the transmission, though

[–] i_ben_fine@lemmy.one 10 points 9 months ago

They want the writeup, because the claims are too vague to falsify.

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, that's why I asked in the first place. I'm zero interested in the credibility of that person. Just somebody check if it's factual. I'm not a Javascript-person but I bet there are debugging-tools and de-minifiers available. Or just someone press Ctrl+Shift+I and look at the inspector.

Edit: Nevermind. Maybe the credibility of an account sometimes is enough.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 14 points 9 months ago

Their reason for not going into any details or provide any evidence is that it might be a government plot and they'd get into trouble for sharing it. Sounds like bullshit to me TBH. Just someone looking for attention.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago
[–] pipe01@lemmy.pipe01.net 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So twitch collects analytics? What a surprise

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

That’s not what they meant.