this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edenedin@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I thought off the body ricochet isn’t a penalty?

[–] Jeffery_Boyardee@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago
[–] Top-Setting5213@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Good thing we have VAR to make things more fair guys

[–] SwayzoMad@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Time to act like a geordie and make up 45 reasons why this was a Penalty 🙂

[–] themightyscott@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Qatar gets a dodgy call versus Saudi Arabia. Oh no... Anyway

[–] Maybe_Heisenberg@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Absolute disgrace . The fact that this penalty could prevent Newcastle from qualifying To R16 is disgusting.

[–] Quiet_Moose7749@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Also have about 2 PSG players in the box/D when he hits it. Should have retaken it.

[–] TrashAtEverything@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

we're not getting the ref comms on this call, are we? 😂

[–] obmisnif@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Ref will probably end up chopped into pieces after the match.

[–] wihannez@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

It’s funny how the same game is played with different rules every day.

[–] MrGoodsss@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The handball rule/decisions in Europe are fkn whack. Only a matter of time before this happened at a truly consequential moment

Man United - Copenhagen was a wild match but neither of those ‘should’ be hand balls if common sense is involved. Can’t remember the others off the top of my head but I’ve disliked pretty much every handball call I’ve seen in the CL this season

[–] gustycat@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

As shit of a decision as it is, it is correct under current UEFA handball guidelines

The amount they favour the attacking side is a slight pisstake

[–] NCL-NYC@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Man seeing him celebrate a 98th minute equaliser against us - and this XI specifically - his hilarious surreal shit.

[–] ritwikjs@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

jesus christ this is horrible. Defenders need to get together and demand change. This is lunacy.

[–] AcePilot95@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago
[–] haven603@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago
[–] UtaLimba@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Merry christmas!

[–] LonSik@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago
[–] Careless-Tailor-2317@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Reece James did the exact same thing in the 2021 UCL final and no penalty was given. Inconsistencies everywhere…

[–] ShermanMcTank@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

So to try to understand what the thought process was a bit more I went to IFAB, and technically the « chest to arm » scenario isn’t covered.

The closest we have is this :

a player heads/kicks the ball and it then hits their own hand/arm? This is not handball (unless the ball goes directly into the opponents’ goal or the player scores immediately afterwards, in which case a direct free kick is awarded to the other team).

This might seem like semantics but maybe the fact it’s not covered is why he went with it ?

Either way it shouldn’t be a thing, a player simply cannot control or predict where the ball is going in this situation. It’s just too unfair to give a penalty for that.

[–] feizhai@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

the sooner we run out of oil the better.

[–] archlorddhami@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

So unfair, but then being owned by a state is also unfair in the larger context

[–] Ams1902@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

A bit tiring to see the same comment over and over : intent does not matter, hitting another part of the body does not matter : read rule 12 it's easy to find (I just did because I thought the other body part was in the rule as well : it's not it's just a PL thing).

I do agree it's harsh but the first handball earlier in the 2nd half should definitely have been given so in my biased opinion, it evens out.

Last thing, if I ever want someone to take this penalty, it's Kylian. The lad just seems unfazed while 40k people are shitting themselves in the stands.

[–] onedollalama@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Tinfoil hat on REEKS of corruption.

[–] poorinspirit@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Absolutely not a penalty

[–] dbeer95@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Abolish pens (for obviously non deliberate handballs at the very least)

[–] -RandomGeordie@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Same situation refereed completely differently by the VAR in the same game. The ref shouldn’t even have had to take a look at the Tino one because the outcome should have been no penalty after a couple of reviews.

[–] ndawjb19@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

they waved off the one from Miley but then give this one? Handball rule is truly fascinating

[–] sdBiotch@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

this is one of the worst referee decisions I've ever seen! What the hell is the point of VAR when you have multiple angles showing the ball came off the chest? what is the argument here? that the arms were extended? criminal if I must say.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Beatenberg@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Why do football fans know the rules better than the referees?? It's really concerning.

[–] CakieFickflip@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Never a pen but I guess you have to just accept the refs decision and move on. Surely Eddie Howe agrees.

[–] Bored-To-Reddit@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Truly awful decision and I’m a Boro fan…

The handball rule is so fucked, so many results are decided because of it and it’s spoiling the game.

Stupid rules aside, how can that be intentional? Ball hits his chest then arm, blasted at him from a yard away, how is it fair in general to give a penalty in that scenario? If the cross went in from dembele, the direction of the ball is going to the edge of the box, Newcastle had about 6 or 7 players back, what’s the xG of that? 0.01? Versus giving a penalty which has an xG of 0.8 maybe?

Shambles from the ref and VAR, happening way too often.

[–] Careless-Tailor-2317@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Only way that's a penalty is if you're playing against Wolves in the prem

[–] _DNL@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Handball all day

[–] SomeRandomRealtor@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Never a penalty. Absolutely ridiculous call and some home cooking in Paris

[–] youlinter@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

A lil’ push for the almighty P$G; never a fucking penalty 😔

[–] tson_92@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Qataris money > Saudi money

[–] lucas_glanville@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I hate the Champions League handball rule.

[–] RadJames@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I gotta say as a neutral I thought there’s no way I could get a good result out of this match but boy was I wrong.

[–] Jimlaheydrunktank@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

If anyone’s played the game you literally can’t do anything with your arms there. Absolutely shocking call.

[–] KrayleyAML@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I was rooting for Newcastle. Then this happened. Absolutely horrible.

[–] Joeomah1999@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

4.5xg for PSG, not quite robbery

[–] KennywasFez@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The game of which oil money are we afraid of more lmao.

[–] meroon63@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The UEFA interpretation of the handball law is just awful. No one that has ever played football before could think that should be a penalty

[–] hobocommand3r@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Defender clearly used his hand as a weapon to attack the ball, good process boys

[–] CJPRD@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Never a pen, you can’t justify this fuckery

[–] SomeRandomRealtor@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

That penalty probably puts PSG through. Absolute fuckery to give that

[–] blixt141@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

What is the defender supposed to do?

[–] SemiLOOSE@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

vell dun boyz, dobra procez

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›