this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
156 points (98.1% liked)

News

32530 readers
3166 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's honestly that simple. Might start a wider war, but to be honest, Ukraine could probably use more real support.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When it comes to Russia it's Enter airspace= shoot down

It's that simple. Yes it is on Russia to make sure they don't fuck that up from now on period. If they cross into anyone else's airspace, send them a location on where to pick up the remains. Let their population realize they are the aggression, and their leaders don't give a fuck about their families.

Edit: yes, Russia will say they weren't crossing airspace, their people aren't any dumber then anywhere else. They will understand just as any of us would. If you think "Norway" or "the U.S." knows something, it's bull, we know nothing more than Russia does

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

Edit: yes, Russia will say they weren't crossing airspace

Can’t cross into foreign airspace if Russia considers all of it its own territory

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Turkey did it once.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago

I agree but only if it's over land so that there's no plausible deniability of airspace violation.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They are testing the water. Seeing if NATO has any teeth or if it's just going to "Strongly condemn" these actions

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They definitely want to see what happens now that the US is basically interested in only itself.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They definitely want to see what happens now that the US is ~~basically interested in only itself.~~ run by a russian asset.

ftfy

It’s really amazing just how completely and embarrassingly the Republican party has become subservient to russia. And how little of a shit they give about the Constitution.

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some of that, but Putin can't afford to loose against Ukraine alone. Getting NATO involved would give him a way of saving face.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We should give him that.

It's not much different than the Kirk shooting. It doesn't matter what the circumstances actually were. They're going to use it how they want anyway.

Is it slightly more convenient if NATO actually defends themselves and Ukraine? Sure. Are they going to say the same things no matter what? Absolutely.

[–] Tuuktuuk@piefed.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think that's really the case. The 700 000 soldiers will still wreak havoc if they return. They need to be absolutely clear heroes so that the people will accept the havoc, and they won't be heroes if the Russia loses to anything, in any manner.

I believe the only reason the Russia is doing this is that they believe they can make NATO break that way.
But, it seems likely that the Article 4 discussions for Poland and Estonia will establish a procedure for behaving with further Russian incursions into NATO airspace. Once that's in place and communicated to the Russia, we can react.

And in all analysis of the Russia, keep this in mind: Putin has never used Internet and is refusing to ever use it. He only accepts information from trusted news sources and his personal aides, all of which are liars. He is extremely strongly out of the loop regarding what's going on around the Russia, and makes weird assumptions. I don't think it holds water that this could break NATO, but it is easy to see why Putin would think it will.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

"Hey... Stop :("

--NATO

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whip up some GLONASS jammers and point them at their jets. See how they like it.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I heard we recently developed an extremely effective jammer that completely disables communications and navigation equipment in the target aircraft. It's called an AMRAAM, and I really hope a russian jet over NATO airspace eats one soon.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago
✓ russian_jets.test.js (1)
  ✓ enter estonia airspace

Test Files  1 passed (1)
     Tests  1 passed (1)
  Start at  02:15:44
  Duration  311ms