this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
436 points (93.6% liked)

News

23644 readers
4029 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I failed to see why there's a controversy here

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Because you don't live in Texas where the only freedom is gun toting religious freedom, and by religion they mean White Christian.

[–] jdf038@mander.xyz 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Something that bugs me: why does the headline/article seem so focused on her being a mother? Lots of people have kids. Shouldn't it say teacher or woman?

Edit: she wasn't a teacher but served on an advisory schoolboard council. I didn't read the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't figure out why the fact that she's a mom is the first thing in the headline.

[–] Waldowal@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

It's to shame her for having sex at least once.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This why you should always have a personal email and work email.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can't be arsed to find the ads but:

It is pretty common for assholes to dox sex workers. Either by finding identifiers in ads or just using a hidden camera when they go for a session. And people REALLY do not understand just how trivial it is to access DMV records (sometimes even legally) and run those through a face recognition program.

This leads to various "reviews" that may or may not get deleted but still get indexed by search engines and make those connections.

So even if she had proper opsec, there are good odds that searching her personal email could make her ads come up regardless.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

It's not illegal to work a 2nd job!?!

[–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m trying to figure out what her being a mom has anything to do with the story. She has kids, who gives a shit? In this country, you’re forced to do it, so what’s the point of calling someone out for it?

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Shame. How dare a MoThEr engage in something so base as sex work? It's written that way explicitly to shame her.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

I hope she reads this.

Use the notoriety to write a book for teenagers. Intelligent parents will buy it, and smart kids will seek it out.

[–] ikapoz@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

So much for a skills-based education model.

[–] wick@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Wait... Is there a difference between a prostitute and an escort? The headline makes it sound like she stopped being the former and is currently the latter.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So here's something "funny."

When police do undercover stings to arrest customers of sex workers, they're described as HUMAN TRAFFICKING STING. And here, on the other hand, this person is described as prostitute [and] working escort.

Schroedinger's sex worker?

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One of several reasons we have so much reported "human trafficking" cases in the US is because our current laws make it so that any time more than one person is working in an organization involved in sex work, it can magically get redefined as human trafficking even if no workers were forced to be there doing the job.

There have been cases of two sex workers that were roommates being accused of trafficking each other because the material aid of being roommates qualified them as traffickers. Or drivers employed by a sex worker to literally escort them to and from clients/airports to take them to and from the airport being busted as pimps and traffickers.

And of course, the whole thing about interstate travel turning sex work into trafficking is loaded with its own horseshit. It's just a reality for a sex worker that the "new girl in town" gets more business, so there's a huge financial incentive for the worker to occasionally do some business travel.

On top of that, when a brothel or organization gets broken up, frequently all the sex workers are offered deals where they have to say they were trafficked and go after the businesses organizers, seen as the "bigger fish".

For one layer worse, now hotels are being super, super hostile to "human trafficking" but really all their "warning signs" and policies are just meant to stop sex workers. So sex workers are forced increasingly to ply their trade in unsafe locations like cars / client accommodations instead of fairly safe hotels. Meanwhile, the hotels themselves ACTUALLY benefit the REAL human trafficking threat that we should be trying to address -- immigrant wage slavery. Because the hotels frequently are the ones subcontracting things like cleaning to incredibly shady sub-minimum wage exploitative employers that are doing actual trafficking-related stuff. So many of the very things that are causing REAL trafficking are using trafficking to attack sex workers for no reason other than puritanical bigotry.

There's infinitely more to say here, but I just can't do the whole thing justice. Here's a really good podcast episode on the subject that is sensitive and clear about how much nonsense there is in the current, widespread "trafficking" moral panic and how much harm it does compared to the good it preaches.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›