Canada

It all comes down to what they define as hate or terrorism.

Well, I mean, the states is pretty close at this point to declaring things like the pride flag as hate symbols. Heck, our own Canadian government is already incredibly wishy washy on the Palestinian flag. A law that says it's illegal / jailable to wave a flag with symbols the government doesn't approve of, is dangerous -- especially when you view the current conflict not as a left vs right thing, but rather as an authoritarian vs individualism/egalitarianism thing.

Something like Carney's "national projects" bills, which allow the govt to ignore various rights claims / environmental issues -- lots of liberals justify it by giving Carney the benefit of the doubt. But that legislation isn't set to expire / be reviewed until sometime midway through the next govts term. Will those people who supported Carney still think it's so great if those powers end up in the hands of PP's Trump-style conservatives? Or have the liberals intentionally tried to set it up as a gift to the conservatives, so that the liberals can then run a "shock and dismay!" campaign for the next cycle, a game of political shenanigans that treats Canadian's rights like a game piece? Who knows.

We're seeing a very clear example of the government redefining what's "hate speech" south of the border currently. It'd be silly not to learn from the US's folly.

Legislation brought in by the current liberal government, while appealing to some liberal supporters, would likely make them scream if the powers were instead given to the conservatives. But the bigger problem in some ways is that both of those parties are aiming for increasingly authoritarian approaches.