this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
599 points (98.7% liked)

politics

26070 readers
3515 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 37 points 6 days ago

WHAT? You mean Jeffrey Epstein's Best Friend who is Kidnapping Children with Unmarked Masked Individuals and taking them to Undisclosed Locations while giving the EXACT same Billionaires on Epstein's List access to This Knowledge DIDNT get the Peace Prize? It's those DAMN LIBRULS FAULTS!

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The deadline for proposing a Nobel prize candidate closed in January, this year. Trump was never even in the running. Which makes his constant whining about it even more pathetic.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I love how they were desperately racing all week to get some sort of concession in Gaza by the end of the week, before they'd make the Nobel announcement on Friday. Meanwhile, they'd already decided on Monday, so he was just blowing his time and energy in a totally wasted effort.

Now the world-class sore LOSER gets to throw a world-class tantrum for the next year as he makes another run at it. Maybe he'll focus his energy on solving conflicts around the world and actually get some accidental good out of his pathetically desperate clawing for validation in the form of ratings, polls, and awards.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I dont think its wasted effort i think its very intentional to make his supporters feel like he was snubbed by the international community.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

That's Plan B. Plan A was always to win.

Propaganda is cool, but it doesn't compare to something shiny.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The deadline could be 10 years from now he's never getting it.

[–] pfunk1978@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

It's like 2 bullies against one weak kid. One bully stands by and watches the other nearly beat the kid to death. The one standing by thinks himself a humanitarian when he says "Hey, that's enough. You kill him and we'll both be in big trouble."

[–] geriatricpark@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I know he’s full of shit, but does anyone know what “eight wars” he supposedly stopped?

[–] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

The 8 wars Trump claims to have ended

Israel and Iran

Rwanda and Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

Armenia and Azerbaijan

Thailand and Cambodia

India and Pakistan

Egypt and Ethiopia

Serbia and Kosovo

Rwanda

Gabon

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

He didn’t earn those elections. His political and corporate backers paid for him to win. They paid to rig the elections and blanket campaign ads in front of all the rural poorly educated morons in America.

Cheeto Mussolini never earned anything in his life. He was given a fortune from his father, which he squandered and ruined every business, he laid his hands on.

The fact that people are arguing about democracy and voting and how this piece of shit got in the office really shows that they missed the greater issue in America. Corporate powers want everyone to fight against each other over social issues, cultural issues, and anything else that distracts people from understanding who is actually in charge.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

But they did give it to one of his Venezuelan toadies as a consolation prize. I wonder if that was intended to piss him off even more.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago

The only prize he deserves is the Nobel Piece of Shit prize.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

On top of all the utter ridiculousness of...well, EVERYTHING now, one would be hard-pressed to make this picture look like more of a deranged evil person than it already does. He looks, acts, and talks like all the worst parts of humanity, and he was put into the most powerful position on the planet. TWICE. I can't even.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Because the most powerful country in the world is evil. He's the best to fund a genocide in order to build on cheap real estate using slave labor.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

the most powerful country in the world is evil.

I can't disagree. The thing is, with how complicit every other supposedly democratic government in the world is being about it, none of them are much better.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

The deadline was like 11 days before or after he was sworn in.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 6 days ago

There's a lesson to be learned here behind just idiot presidents and Nobel prizes. In almost every situation, Regime change if more effective is spear headed internally by an opposition leader rather that forced by an external power.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 125 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The fact that it went to a Venezeuelan woman is going to absolutely enrage him.

[–] AliSaket@mander.xyz 17 points 6 days ago

That particular Venezuelan woman was one of the leaders of the coup attempt against Chavez in the early 2000s and has been an opposition leader ever since. What makes this complicated is that she welcomed sanctions and coup attempts by the US, including during Trump's first term and she even pleaded to Netanyahu to liberate Venezuela with military force (wasn't able to find a better source since search results are very award focused right now).

She has close ties to Israel's Likud party, and wants to open the Venezuelan embassy in Jerusalem after Chavez ended diplomatic relations after their assault on Gaza in 2009 and likened Venezuela's struggle to the one of Israel.

From the will of Alfred Nobel outlining who is to receive the prize:

and one part to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.

I'm wondering how the committee is squaring this requirement with her calling for "the use of power" by external forces.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 102 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Loses? He was never eligible to win it in the first place. You can nominate a goldfish to win a mountaineering award all you like, but that doesn't mean it going to happen.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (18 children)

NBC had to stop carrying the show "The Biggest Loser" because it was clear in 2015 both who accurately held the title and would continue to for the next decade.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›