this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
114 points (98.3% liked)

Europe

7534 readers
451 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Little lungs are still paying for Dieselgate every day,” says Jemima Hartshorn, the founder of the Mums for Lungs campaign group. Her own young daughter has suffered serious breathing problems, which at their worst involved the harrowing experience of having to pin her to the floor to administer an inhaler.

It is 10 years since the scandal erupted, exposing cars that pumped out far more toxic fumes on the road than when passing regulatory tests in the lab. But Dieselgate is far from over.

The excess pollution emitted has already killed about 16,000 people in the UK and caused 30,000 cases of asthma in children, experts have estimated. A further 6,000 early deaths will occur in coming years without action, they say.

Oh my god. So, they caused an estimated 16,000 deaths, in the UK alone. And 6000 more are about to follow. Only for driver's convenience - and companie's profits. In what a world do we live that this is considered ethically different from murder?

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

In what a world do we live that this is considered ethically different from murder?

Because you'd have to proof in every single case beyond any reasonable doubt, that the emmisions are the cause of the premature death, which is virtually impossible.

Statistical murder is easy to get away with.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well, as I wrote, I am interested in the ethical side of it, not the legal fine print. It might be as you describe, or not. And certainly, in most countries you can't call somebody a murderer before that was found by a court, so I am not going to do that. I am not a lawyer, so that stuff does not really interest me.

(About the specific statistical argument, I am not so sure - for example in 2008 in China there was a scandal (or could we name that one "crime"), where the substance melamine was mixed into baby food for an infant formula, which lead to the death of childen, and in that case some people were found guilty.)

But that's a bit beneath the point. As a scientist (applied physicist), I look at this as that actions have consequences, which can when we are lucky, be described by science, and lead to conclusions beyound reasonable doubt.

We know that air pollution causes people to die, and it is possible to reasonably estimate how much deaths some amount of pollution causes. In the case of the Diesel cars, specific emissions were by a factor of fifty larger than allowed, and that was concealed because it was not legal to sell such cars. Here, we have actions that, by all what we know, killed lots of people - how should society deal with that?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“Finally”? Could’ve sworn VW had a huge settlement payment in multiple countries and stopped making diesel cars altogether.

Some people were also jailed irc