this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
57 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

73287 readers
4411 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
57
Physicists May Have Found a Hard Limit on The Performance of Large Quantum Computers (www.sciencealert.com)
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Physicists May Have Found a Hard Limit on The Performance of Large Quantum Computers::undefined

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toroknos_07@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe Bethesda will optimise their games when we reach that point!

[–] Starkstruck@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I think humans inventing stable time travel is more likely than that

[–] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Look at this guy moving the goal posts. I travel through time all the time but now I have to be stable?

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We can use that to render the next frame in server farm in the future after cheap fusion drops electricity prices, but before [Redacted Future Event]. That will mean optimization is entirely unnecessary.

load more comments (2 replies)