this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
573 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Could Bitcoin Millhouse be even less likeable? Yes, the answer is yes.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He's gaslighting canadians. Laaaaaaaame

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lets hope the cons lose the next election and they run him off like every leader they have when they don't get in.

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is it too much to hope for that they also realize that going ever harder might be the wrong approach?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In the current climate? Yes.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Dude. Cruel cronyism is dumb in all climates.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago

Can we give him a one way ticket to Florida?

[–] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago

Squinty McProudBoy should move to texas and take his racist, white supremacist, misogynist, fascist base with him.

[–] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

Fuck what a trump level shit stain.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

Poilievre tries to cancel Christmas

[–] TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Can't the Speaker shut that shit down? Especially since he's admitted exactly what he plans to do?

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Based solely on the merit of the amendments they've proposed, such as changing titles or a single word, they should face some sort of punishment for wasting precious time. It's clearly meant to do nothing but waste time and guess who pays for it?

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

Speaker does that and next time it'll be amendments created by ChatGPT. Long ones. It's hard to have a process that cannot be weaponized or deadlocked without removing the process entirely. Or, well, relying on people being good actors.

[–] Octospider@lemmy.one 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's all we get from our politicians. Nothing substantial. Just gimmicks like this.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is he your politician? Sorry. You need to vote better.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who is better? The NDP and Liberal parties are only barely less worse.

[–] Splitdipless@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'll take the party that is marginally better than the rest. Why wouldn't you select the best option?

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Would you rather be punched in the face, neck, or balls? There is no best option. The options are 3 parties who will, without a doubt, make this country less livable to varying degrees.

[–] Splitdipless@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry buddy, but being dragged up and offered where to be punched, I'm absolutely exercising my right to choose (and to be honest, I'm kind of thinking neck at the moment). I refuse to be a sad sack that gets punched in the balls and laments that there was no other option.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Proud to choose a punch in the neck because at least it wasn't the balls! Our political system is woefully broken.

[–] Splitdipless@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

We have systems for that. We can join the various 'teams' of people doing the punching and we can, as a group, demand that they change their practices - next convention the group votes on replacing ball punches with a hearty 'punchbuggy' to the shoulder. Several leaders run and make promises on how hearty to make that shoulder-punch, and we select someone for the next election between face, neck and shoulder. You don't get to complain about where the 3 parties are punching if you aren't in there telling them to change their target - otherwise you got party die-hards saying things like "we've always punched to the neck, and that's what Canadians want."

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wow. That could make him go down in the polls. Not a great move.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It won't. He has a bedrock of support thanks to basic political tribalism, and he and his handlers probably calculate that they run a greater risk of alienating their base if they run moderate, than running moderate and raising their ceiling. And given how badly the opposite strategy has worked for the NDP (which is alienating it's base to chase the middle) he's not wrong.

tl;dr: if he keeps acting like a protofascist, he'll keep his job, and he might even win if enough people feel Trudeau has worn out his welcome.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

his handlers probably calculate that they run a greater risk of alienating their base if they run moderate, than running moderate and raising their ceiling

I don't think that's possible. Who else will Conservatives vote for? The CPC could act like LPC/NDP and they'd still get their core voters to vote them in because as long as they aren't 'red' or 'orange'.. they're 'good'.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They'd stay home on the general election, and vote for someone to replace Pollievre in the next leadership review.

Pollievre knows he needs to keep feeding red meat to the proto-fascist base, lest they turn on him.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No that fanbase does not stay home. They will vote blue even if they ran a rock as their leader.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Exactly. Not voting means your team won't get elected and for many, it is a team sport.

They hate the opposition more than they could hate themselves.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Do I have the option to vote for an inanimate object? It could be a step up.