this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10587 readers
387 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 69 points 2 years ago

While I'm glad he's broke, I'll be even more glad if I never see or hear his name again.

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This isn't the slam dunk folks think it is as Kyle Rittenhouse isn't broke per se but isn't getting to dictate a lot of his wealth. And it's complicated because Kyle is a pawn so trying to state things in terms of "how does this affect Kyle Rittenhouse" is missing a larger point about how Kyle is to the GOP actually useful.

First off, Kyle's book bombed. It's not good. Even for those from the Conservative realm, it's not a good book. This is likely in that a lot of what was promised by the book was either culled or just never written to begin with given that Kyle is facing civil litigation now and a book giving "full account" would not help his position. But also the author, yeah it's complicated but most people do not actually write their own biographies, Michael Quinn Sullivan isn't a good writer. He's one of the Republican's think tank folks from Empower Texans which… that's its own ball of yarn to untangle so I'll just end it there. I'm sure guy is a great GOP strategist, he just really sucks at writing and you can really feel the "suck" level of his writing in his sci-fi book Finding the Void. But you know everyone has different taste so Sullivan is a more "specific" taste, and Kyle didn't pick Sullivan, that's who was suggested to him for his book. And this gets to the point.

Kyle is a pawn. The GOP is using him for an agenda and Kyle is just looking for a paycheck. And something people should quickly note, don't rely on the GOP to hand you a paycheck. This shouldn't be new knowledge, but just in case anyone is out there: You get paid by political organizations based on utility and that's true for both of them. But there is a caveat to this seeming "both sides" and boy oh boy is it the GOP is some of the most fickle of political groups. With the GOP it can be here today, gone tomorrow like a beach house in a hurricane. Democrats do indeed back away from "troublesome" folks within their own rank, but man GOP people will drop you like you were Cobalt-60.

And this gets into Kyle's "foundation". Right out the door, it's not exactly doing as well as folks might have hoped. it's operating at -$60k with 72% of its expense being Charitable Disbursements, which is fancy talk for "someone got paid". And that's likely indicative that Kyle's foundation is being used as a funnel for money for someone else. Which absolutely indicates that Kyle isn't getting a say in the foundation but boy oh boy is he the face for it. Usually a low revenue, high disbursement means mismanagement and I'm doubting that the far-right folks that helped him set it up put a moron in charge of it. It's likely that the person they put in charge of it is getting a pay check for (insert wild speculation here). But point being someone is being rewarded that's not Kyle Rittenhouse.

"Now that's what I call being a pawn!". There's clearly a lot of people who want to give Kyle Rittenhouse, for whatever reason, money. The thing is, that money is passing though hands that are distinctly not Kyle Rittenhouse's hands and that's Kyle's actual finical issues. Not that he doesn't have money or he's not popular enough to rake in money, it's that he hasn't been promoted on the chessboard that is the GOP politics to a chess piece that gets to enjoy some of his spoils. He is very much "useful tool" but a lot of the public information about him and his finances show, he is not getting any benefits, or at least very few of them. Someone else (or perhaps the plural version of that) is raking in the cash due Kyle.

Given the GOP, I don't think any of this comes off as shocking news to anyone that Kyle's money is being slowly siphoned from him. Or that true endeavors of his "like his book" are only given token measures of care. That's a lot of the GOP this day and age. The second someone becomes a nonuseful tool it's "Phil Valentine who?" Kyle has money, he's just not allowed to use it. Other people get to use Kyle's money. That should be the key take away here.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

Yeah, he really leaned into being a pawn instead of forging his own identity. He was too young to know that he wouldn’t be the main beneficiary of the grift and that it would not be a viable career.

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 25 points 2 years ago

Hey guys, it's me again, I just wanted to say I'm still a child mascot for uncontrolled weapon violence.

Hey, if you give me like $500. I'll bounce around like a kangaroo and pretend that I am defending gun rights, when all I did was treat a protest like call of duty match.

Rot away in obscurity.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Seathru@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago

After referencing actress-comedienne and Trump supporter Roseanne Barr earlier in the interview, Grammer was asked by host Justin Webb if he was still a supporter of the former president.

“I am,” Grammer said. “And I’ll let that be the end of it.”

🤮

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

Cry more, fash.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

What a pathetic little bitch.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you can dodge criminal discharge of a firearm, you can dodge a bill. Seriously though, how did he manage to blow through his speaking money? I’d read that he’d earned 10k on several.

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Only so many people want to hear him talk.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

looks like all of the ammosexuals and murdersturbators found someplace else to get off...

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

I’d never heard the term Ammosexual, that’s great. Now I kinda want to see the UrbanDictionary listing for a “Fully Loaded Magazine”.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago

Thanks for letting us know.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago

2 days ago: https://www.newsweek.com/kyle-rittenhouses-new-book-bombs-kindle-1849647

Rittenhouse may be disappointed because according to figures from Amazon, the work is sitting at #9,569 in the Kindle Store sector as of Tuesday. It also ranks 510 in Nonfiction in the Kindle store.

oof

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

"Well done book about someone forced to defend themselves and what that means in America now. Well done. Highly recommend for everyone, especially now," one reviewer wrote.

Stay home – also conservatives.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

mild_shock.jpg