this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
241 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31368 readers
2108 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In communities of all kinds, voters in their 20s and 30s are confronting a financial reality of rising costs, mounting debt and minimal wage growth. But how is this changing their political views?

It's a question that NPR put to readers. We received more than 1,100 submissions from across the political spectrum from almost every state in the U.S.

Many described a similar reality — one where economic worries loom large over their everyday lives and erode their faith in the ability of those in power. Taken together, their responses paint a portrait of a generation of voters discouraged by what they see in Washington and who increasingly feel as if they have no political home.

It is important to note that the responses are not from a representative sample of all young voters. But what readers shared helps highlight a steep challenge facing Democrats and Republicans alike as they work to win over these voters, who are collectively expected to make up more than half the electorate in 2028. Here is a snapshot of what readers shared.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20251031121338/https://www.npr.org/2025/10/31/nx-s1-5590153/young-voters-american-dream-economy

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 31 points 11 months ago (5 children)

And it’s funny how the answer seems to be turning to the right wing. Concept that makes absolutely no sense

[–] __ghost__@lemmy.ml 38 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I grew up in a very conservative area. The people in my demographic only want to see change. The right wing government under Trump has been robbing the future blind with zero regard for anyone, but the sentiment I keep hearing is a perception that something is happening. "He's deporting the criminals," "he's saving our jobs," "he's making other countries pay us," "he's making America safe," ergo the idea that progression in any direction is progress. People are stupid and short sighted when they are struggling. So the adoption of populism makes a lot of sense to me

Another anecdote, there was a guy I used to work with that would say "we have to go all the way right to come back to center" and they actually believe that would happen lol

Anyway I hate this shit so much, have a good day

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I also live in a very conservative area with no hopes of moving any time soon. Your comment is spot on, they think he's actually trying to help when he is literally doing the opposite. However, it does appear that grocery prices going way up at the same time he's building a ballroom has kinda broken through to them a little bit. I'm sure they'll forget it in a week though like always :/

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’ve seen this theorised as being one of the key reasons that Harris lost. Obama campaigned on “change” and won. So did Trump. So did Biden. And Harris’ pitch was kind of “I’m going to keep doing what Biden was!”

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Any political novice could see there was no right answer there.

You can't promise change when you yourself served in the government 4 straight years as VP. They'd question why you didn't do any of this stuff already

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

It actually makes a ton of sense and has oodles and gobs of historical precedent. Fascism is what happens during capitalist crisis. When you weaken education, revoke social safety nets, delay retirement age, encourage unaffordable housing, withhold wages, withold healthcare, and promote wealth inequality, you're going to get fascists. The emerging fascist wing is anything but irrational. They are reacting to real issues, and so they flock to the only people who appear to actually get anything done: the right.

At the moment that the “normal” police and military resources of the bourgeois dictatorship, together with their parliamentary screens, no longer suffice to hold society in a state of equilibrium – the turn of the fascist regime arrives. Through the fascist agency, capitalism sets in motion the masses of the crazed petty bourgeoisie and the bands of declassed and demoralized lumpenproletariat – all the countless human beings whom finance capital itself has brought to desperation and frenzy.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It doesn't work on logic. It works on identity and feelings. Mostly anger.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Becuase the so called "Left" Democrats aren't offering any real alternatives of lasting change. Only the Right are doing that

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But the rights offer is practically openly 'We want to make everything worse for everybody' shouted with extreme enthusiasm for some reason.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago

No, they're saying that things will get better if we get all our anger out on these specific people.

Of course it won't fix anything, but people are gullible

[–] Lenny@lemmy.zip 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can we have some [American Dream]?

We have some at home.

At home: [American Nightmare]

[–] bluesocks@lemmings.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We're really living in a neo-liberal's wet dream.

This is all according to plan for the people making 6 figures and have homes that cost at least $400,000.

Trump isn't raising their taxes.

spoilerAnyone who thinks millionaires are not part of the problem is a fucking idiot.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 14 points 11 months ago

Maybe figure out a new American dream, like punching Nazis, or eating the rich

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

GenX here... No. Just fucking no. Not in the fucking slightest.

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I mean...

Kinda looks like your gen is going full boomer

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jeez look at this statistical minority give em a medal (their whole generation is ultimately just desperate for attention)

[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Actually, our generation is known for quite the opposite.

[–] bluesocks@lemmings.world 8 points 11 months ago

There is no political fix.

The only solution is violence.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

there is no fix within the current system, it is working as intended

it needs to be reset

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 7 points 11 months ago

For many? For most.

[–] radieschen@slrpnk.net 6 points 11 months ago

Wouldn't revolution be considered a "political fix"?

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago

Millennials have been saying this since 2008, and they're only seriously considering it now??

I'd say I'm surprised, but after almost two decades of being told that my concerns over housing prices, student debt, poor wages, unaffordable healthcare, etc aren't important right now because Dems need moderate Republicans to vote for them, I'm really not.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Feels that way for some of us older voters, too.

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

The political answer is to vote for DSA and WFP candidates every time they run in a Democratic Party primary.

Looking at the Republican Party it took about 8 years (2008 - 2016) for the Tea Party to completely reshape.

I bet we could do it faster.