this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

xkcd

8814 readers
184 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2827

Alt text:

Sequoia Brussels sprouts are delicious but it's pretty hard to finish one.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is especially funny to me because I tell people all the time about kale being a man made (cultivated) plant from the wild mustard seed.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I usually ask people to name a food stuff that hasn't been genetically manipulated in some way by human hands. You can't. There really are none. Even non-gmo food stuffs are still selectively bred or clonal species.

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blackberries have grown wild in Europe for thousands of years. The US ones have been messed with by farmers and scientists, but in the UK they're pretty much the original deal.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I was thinking about this recently. Wild blackberries you see all over the place growing like a weed are pretty much the exact same as the ones you see in a shop.

It's nothing like, say, apples, which have been changed a lot by humans.

[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fish.

Also macadamias, and lillipilli. And the cabbage tree palm. Warrigal Greens.

Coconuts, I expect.

I am yet to believe the humble blackberry is a cultivar.

Possibly kangaroo meat? Boomers such as the Eastern Grey are pretty unmanipulated, and taste like venison.

But mostly fish. And lobsters/crays/crabs.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s just an edible rock.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So, not genetically manipulated, then. 🤷‍♂️

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is it not the case that kale, broccoli, cauliflower and cabbage are all basically derived from the same plant?

This is what I've been told, but I am very ignorant of such matters and while you will say that I can simply Google the issue, which is true, it's never been enough of a priority for me to do so, goddammit.

As for Sequoia sempervirens or Sequoiadendron giganteum being forms of broccoli, I do in fact know enough dendrology to know that it's bullshyte.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I hate when people say Google things, fuck off I'm here for the community.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The alt text is wrong, isn't it?

[–] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

In this case, it's not really on OP; that's what Randall puts in the xkcd alt text. There is a transcription for each comic on explainxkcd that ppl could copy to the post though

[–] yolta@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Regardless of the other comment, you're right, the alt text is wrong. Alt text is used by visually impaired users to understand what the image is about and is not the place to put the title of the XKCD.

[–] agnomeunknown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's not the title, but rather a sort of "bonus joke" that pops up when you hover a cursor over the image (or long press on mobile I think). It's a staple of xkcd and other webcomics, but I'll grant that it does present some confusion for those who rely on alt text.

I for one appreciated that being in the post so I didn't need to click thru for the bonus joke as I usually would. Perhaps it's just better to call it something other than alt text.