this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
7 points (88.9% liked)

Science

18201 readers
48 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TwentyEight@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Didn't actually red the article did you?

[–] TwentyEight@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I must be in triple figures papers on climate change I have read. I have also seen countless examples of this dtivel. There is zero chance I am wasting a second on it.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What the article talks about is that a study pointed out a long-term climate process involving algae. As the planet warms, it can lead to larger and more frequent algal blooms in the oceans due to warmer waters and increased nutrients. When these algae die, they sink and sequester carbon in deep-sea sediments, effectively removing it from the atmosphere for a very long time. Their research suggests that the process would take thousands of years to result in significant global cooling. It's an extremely slow, natural feedback loop. The researchers emphasize that it operates on a timeline that is completely irrelevant to our current, human-caused climate crisis.

But hey, why read the actual article when you can just throw a tantrum like a child.