this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1095 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

72320 readers
3737 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 144 points 2 years ago

Someone, light the EU signal!

Lawsuit intensifies in the distance

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 115 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Fuck Google. Ruining the internet for profit.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago (5 children)

They dont want to just run it.

they want to control and dictate it.

Google needs a massive regulatory hammer to come down on it and smash it into dozens, if not hundreds, of tiny individual companies

[–] Dee@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That needs to happen more with Alphabet than Google but either would be great.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You and everyone on the entire planet knew what i meant.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 86 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can you say Anticompetition practices?

1 lawsuit, 2 lawsuit, 3 lawsuit ah ah ah

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Slam dunks, yes. But does any of the people who would bring a case against then have enough money to fight an army of more lawyers? Probably not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 years ago

YouTube thinks aarch64 Firefox is... a HiSense TV?!?!?!?!

Ah yes, televisions are exactly where the user wants lower resolution

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 76 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 68 points 2 years ago (15 children)

They finally made YouTube unusable for me even with ublock. Refreshing the filters didn't work and told me I could only watch 3 videos.

Google was always going to win the war but I didn't expect it to be like this.

I'm now using piped for all YouTube videos.

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I randomly stopped getting the anti-adblocking. On my gaming PC I never got them, on my laptop they went away after I disabled my adblocking for one video and then re-enabled it. Now I don't get them at all. Did they give up on me?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Using an alternative front end isn’t losing

Once they get rid of front ends and you go back they’ll have won

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

You are remembering to purge all caches before refreshing I hope?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 60 points 2 years ago (1 children)

User Agent String: A browser's way of lying about what it is, in order to not trigger some server's arcane content filtering system.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 52 points 2 years ago (14 children)

User Agents should be optional. The whole idea of the Internet was that the server should respond the same way to the same request regardless of the client's qualities.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Hmm, anti competitive practices.

If only there was some kind of legislation that protected an open and fair internet...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The more bullshit like this I read about YouTube the more I despite them. I already use GrayJay on mobile and I'm using ublock Origin + ublock Matrix on Librewolf to control cookie usage on desktop. So far I've been able escape the video player block by clearing cache.

I'm just waiting for the day they "force" me onto another frontend.

[–] Jeom@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (7 children)

doesnt ublock origin already block youtube's anti adblock?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 55 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

From what I can understand from the thread, they aren't deliberatly crippling FF.

[–] windowsphoneguy@feddit.de 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The way I read it is Chrome gets a pass on the architecture crippling, the others don't.

Someone correct me if I got the wrong idea.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

So Google is saying out loud they are trying to be Microsoft and abuse its near monopoy to push their other products.

Got it.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It looks like also this was against adblocker so, again, not specifically Firefox. Quote from the article itself:

The issue was initially reported as targeting Firefox users, but users online have said they’re seeing the delay in Chrome and Edge, too. Reddit and Hacker News users who’ve examined the code that appears to be causing the delay have said they see no indication that YouTube checks what kind of browser is in use. Mozilla’s senior brand manager Damiano DeMonte wrote in an email to The Verge that “there’s no evidence that this is a Firefox-specific issue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Which turned out to also have nothing to do with FF but is targeting adblockers.

[–] slimarev92@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I like how nobody actually bothered to read the thread and doesn't understand this is a bug and wasn't done on purpose.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Having bugs for platforms outside the walled garden is a feature of the walled garden. That's the beauty of it, they don't need to purposefully cripple Firefox and other engines if they just don't take it into account when creating features.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Quite a reductive statement based on a very small obscured window into what Google is doing with user agent profiling but go off I guess since you’re so sure

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's not. First of all, the code doesn't check for Firefox at all. Second, it blocks 4K for all Android devices. Conclusions people came up with here just show utter ignorance.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] senorblackbean@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Switched to Freetube/Invidious. Like the sun, I'm never looking directly at Youtube.com ever again.

[–] muzzle@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Joke is on them, i only ever use NewPipe (or freetube on desktop)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It might just be a coincidence but I've had a lot of trouble using Invidious or Piped lately too. Videos load and titles load, but video thumbnails don't load for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Steelmanning: perhaps no ARM Linux system was capable of playing 4K reliably until Asahi Linux came along?

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 37 points 2 years ago

Someone on the Hacker News cross-post mentioned it, but it seems like they assumed any ARM Linux device that wasn't detected as running Android was some low-power device like a Raspberry Pi, and didn't anticipate more powerful devices running bog-standard Linux until Apple Silicon and thus Asahi came along.

[–] whfsdude@dmv.social 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's probably the case that this was good intent given the lack of desktop ARM computing hardware, but they really should let the client decide the video quality.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Asahi Linux?

They named a distro after a beer brand?

[–] autokludge@programming.dev 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Asahi means “rising sun” in Japanese, and it is also the name of an apple cultivar. 旭りんご (asahi ringo) is what we know as the McIntosh Apple, the apple variety that gave the Mac its name.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

... They named Macs after a beer brand?

[–] violetraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago

That was fascinating. Thank you for sharing 💖

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Lina asahi is steamer who reverse engineering apple m1 chip for Linux, so asahi linux was distro for apple m1 at first

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sprokes@jlai.lu 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think they want everyone to use user agent switcher so that Firefox share will drop and then nobody will support it and will die.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Easy: use a user agent switcher that uses blacklists. Mine only spoofs chrome for youtube.com.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 13 points 2 years ago

Disgusting!

load more comments
view more: next ›